I saw the video of today's continuation of the 12/22 council meeting and I am still shaking my head about what went on. Please, we need more people to come to council meetings - next one is 1/5/10 - COW @ 6:30, Council @ 8:00 - the insanity has to stop. If we don't hold them accountable, who knows what kind of mess we'll find ourselves in. And we will be the ones footing the bill for their foolishness.
In my opinion, the Mayor is out of control. Power has gone to his head.
Anyone who disagrees with him, or is friends with the new councilman, has a political motive whenever they question the council, at least according to the mayor. That is not always the case. Even if it were true, wasn't it politics that got him elected? Now he doesn't like politics? Going must be getting rough.
Just because the press was there, he accused a citizen of making remarks and asking questions just because the press was there. This woman has asked questions of the council for months - press or no press.
Then the Mayor tried to tell this citizen that she had not actually asked any questions - I believe he told her "You thought you did", or words to that effect. The video will have the exact wording. And when the council woman wanted to answer one of the questions (that the mayor said wasn't asked) the mayor denied her permission to do so. What?!!??
According to Marlin's Rules it seems that questions are only questions if he thinks they deserve an answer and council members are not permitted to speak without asking for his permission. This is insane!
Please get yourself to a council meeting and stop this train wreck.
Thursday, December 31, 2009
Friday, December 25, 2009
The Suits Just Keep Coming
Hackensack police chief named in another lawsuit
Thursday, December 24, 2009
Last updated: Thursday December 24, 2009, 8:50 PM
BY PETER J. SAMPSON
The Record
STAFF WRITER
10 Comments Embattled Hackensack Police Chief Ken Zisa has been named in yet another lawsuit, the fourth this year by members of his department, on charges of scheming to extort political contributions and votes, and retaliating against officers who fail to do his bidding.
Three new plaintiffs – Officers Allen Borntrager of Midland Park, Frank Cavallo of Hackensack and Rocco Duardo of Saddle Brook – joined two of the officers who filed complaints last summer – Lt. Vincent Riotto of Hackensack and Sgt. Scott Sybel of River Edge – in the latest suit in U.S. District Court in Newark.
The 22-page complaint, which was filed electronically late Wednesday, mirrors the allegations previously raised against the chief and a cadre of allied officers.
“As long as Zisa and his cronies continue to harass and retaliate against my clients for exercising their First Amendment rights, I will continue to bring lawsuits … to defend their rights,” said Mark B. Frost, a Philadelphia attorney who is now representing nine current and former officers in two federal suits against the chief and the city.
The latest complaint alleges that the officers are being harassed and brought up on false charges because of their involvement in or association with plaintiffs in the earlier lawsuits, Frost said today. Thirteen officers are now suing the chief in federal and state court.
Cavallo’s cousin Ralph, and Duardo’s brother, Anthony, were among six plaintiffs, including Sybel and Riotto, who sued the chief, the city and a handful of officers on June 24 alleging civil rights and racketeering violations.
Borntrager, the 100-member department’s lead firearms instructor, claims he was punished for failing to wear his hat – his only instance of discipline in 14 years. That punishment, he alleges, was retaliation for associating with Sybel, his supervisor, and other officers suing the chief and for his unwillingness to donate funds to Zisa and his candidates.
In the two suits filed by Frost and co-counsel John J. Zidziunas of Jersey City, the chief is accused of using his office for financial and political gain by “extorting” money from the ranks of his department to support his candidacy in state Assembly races, as well as candidates for other public and union offices.
Zisa, who was appointed chief in 1995 by his brother, former Mayor Jack Zisa, and served as a state assemblyman from 1994 to 2002, has denied any abuse of office and suggested the allegations were politically motivated attacks by disgruntled officers.
Asked for comment today, Zisa said, “Sounds to me like the same bogus allegations.”
City officials declined to comment, but Stephen Lo Iacono, the city manager, noted the cost of defending any litigation is always a concern.
“Especially in the environment that we are in,” he said. “And again, where these lawsuits are coming from, is an additional concern, and it’s something that we have to deal with.”
The other defendants in the new suit are Captains Thomas Salcedo and Danilo Garcia and Sgt. James Smith. They did not return a message seeking comment.
During the 2008 election for state union delegate, the suit alleges, one captain strode around police headquarters with a sign on his back telegraphing the chief’s favored candidate while a sergeant guarded the ballot box, demanding to see how each officer voted and recording the names of those who refused to divulge their ballot.
Officers were warned that failing to disclose their ballot would be considered a vote against the chief and a show of disloyalty, the suit said.
In other claims, Cavallo said he suffered retaliation from Zisa and Smith after reporting Smith for allegedly making derogatory racial remarks and using excessive force against a Hispanic suspect in an alleged burglary attempt. Cavallo was brought up on charges of using improper tactics, but the allegations were later found to be unwarranted, the suit said.
Duardo claims he was falsely accused of leaving his shift early and subjected to an internal affairs investigation and verbal reprimand by Zisa because of his brother’s participation in the earlier suit. Duardo also alleges he was wrongly brought up on charges of insubordination and lying by Smith.
Riotto and Sybel both cite instances of alleged retaliation in which they were ordered by Salcedo to list medications they use and to provide urine samples, in violation of federal law and state attorney general’s guidelines. The tests came back negative, the suit said.
Sybel also alleges he was wrongly suspended for two days for failing to write up Borntrager for removing his hat when he was sick and had difficulty hearing, according to the suit.
After filing suit in June, Sybel was transferred from patrol to the housing division — “a less desirable position that is used as punishment” — and ordered to work a 3 p.m. to 11 p.m. shift, in a move designed to take time away from his family and other activities, the suit said. He also claims he has been given fewer opportunities to work on special overtime details.
The two-count suit accuses the defendants of violating the officers’ right to free speech and association and alleges city policies and customs encouraged the chief to believe he could violate his officers’ rights with impunity.
The suit seeks an order enjoining the city from continuing such practices as well as unspecified compensatory and punitive damages.
Staff writer Monsy Alvarado contributed to this article. E-mail:sampson@northjersey.com
Page 1 2 >>
Embattled Hackensack Police Chief Ken Zisa has been named in yet another lawsuit, the fourth this year by members of his department, on charges of scheming to extort political contributions and votes, and retaliating against officers who fail to do his bidding.
Three new plaintiffs – Officers Allen Borntrager of Midland Park, Frank Cavallo of Hackensack and Rocco Duardo of Saddle Brook – joined two of the officers who filed complaints last summer – Lt. Vincent Riotto of Hackensack and Sgt. Scott Sybel of River Edge – in the latest suit in U.S. District Court in Newark.
The 22-page complaint, which was filed electronically late Wednesday, mirrors the allegations previously raised against the chief and a cadre of allied officers.
“As long as Zisa and his cronies continue to harass and retaliate against my clients for exercising their First Amendment rights, I will continue to bring lawsuits … to defend their rights,” said Mark B. Frost, a Philadelphia attorney who is now representing nine current and former officers in two federal suits against the chief and the city.
The latest complaint alleges that the officers are being harassed and brought up on false charges because of their involvement in or association with plaintiffs in the earlier lawsuits, Frost said today. Thirteen officers are now suing the chief in federal and state court.
Cavallo’s cousin Ralph, and Duardo’s brother, Anthony, were among six plaintiffs, including Sybel and Riotto, who sued the chief, the city and a handful of officers on June 24 alleging civil rights and racketeering violations.
Borntrager, the 100-member department’s lead firearms instructor, claims he was punished for failing to wear his hat – his only instance of discipline in 14 years. That punishment, he alleges, was retaliation for associating with Sybel, his supervisor, and other officers suing the chief and for his unwillingness to donate funds to Zisa and his candidates.
In the two suits filed by Frost and co-counsel John J. Zidziunas of Jersey City, the chief is accused of using his office for financial and political gain by “extorting” money from the ranks of his department to support his candidacy in state Assembly races, as well as candidates for other public and union offices.
Zisa, who was appointed chief in 1995 by his brother, former Mayor Jack Zisa, and served as a state assemblyman from 1994 to 2002, has denied any abuse of office and suggested the allegations were politically motivated attacks by disgruntled officers.
Asked for comment today, Zisa said, “Sounds to me like the same bogus allegations.”
City officials declined to comment, but Stephen Lo Iacono, the city manager, noted the cost of defending any litigation is always a concern.
“Especially in the environment that we are in,” he said. “And again, where these lawsuits are coming from, is an additional concern, and it’s something that we have to deal with.”
The other defendants in the new suit are Captains Thomas Salcedo and Danilo Garcia and Sgt. James Smith. They did not return a message seeking comment.
During the 2008 election for state union delegate, the suit alleges, one captain strode around police headquarters with a sign on his back telegraphing the chief’s favored candidate while a sergeant guarded the ballot box, demanding to see how each officer voted and recording the names of those who refused to divulge their ballot.
Officers were warned that failing to disclose their ballot would be considered a vote against the chief and a show of disloyalty, the suit said.
In other claims, Cavallo said he suffered retaliation from Zisa and Smith after reporting Smith for allegedly making derogatory racial remarks and using excessive force against a Hispanic suspect in an alleged burglary attempt. Cavallo was brought up on charges of using improper tactics, but the allegations were later found to be unwarranted, the suit said.
Duardo claims he was falsely accused of leaving his shift early and subjected to an internal affairs investigation and verbal reprimand by Zisa because of his brother’s participation in the earlier suit. Duardo also alleges he was wrongly brought up on charges of insubordination and lying by Smith.
Riotto and Sybel both cite instances of alleged retaliation in which they were ordered by Salcedo to list medications they use and to provide urine samples, in violation of federal law and state attorney general’s guidelines. The tests came back negative, the suit said.
Sybel also alleges he was wrongly suspended for two days for failing to write up Borntrager for removing his hat when he was sick and had difficulty hearing, according to the suit.
After filing suit in June, Sybel was transferred from patrol to the housing division — “a less desirable position that is used as punishment” — and ordered to work a 3 p.m. to 11 p.m. shift, in a move designed to take time away from his family and other activities, the suit said. He also claims he has been given fewer opportunities to work on special overtime details.
The two-count suit accuses the defendants of violating the officers’ right to free speech and association and alleges city policies and customs encouraged the chief to believe he could violate his officers’ rights with impunity.
The suit seeks an order enjoining the city from continuing such practices as well as unspecified compensatory and punitive damages.
Staff writer Monsy Alvarado contributed to this article. E-mail:sampson@northjersey.com
Thursday, December 24, 2009
Last updated: Thursday December 24, 2009, 8:50 PM
BY PETER J. SAMPSON
The Record
STAFF WRITER
10 Comments Embattled Hackensack Police Chief Ken Zisa has been named in yet another lawsuit, the fourth this year by members of his department, on charges of scheming to extort political contributions and votes, and retaliating against officers who fail to do his bidding.
Three new plaintiffs – Officers Allen Borntrager of Midland Park, Frank Cavallo of Hackensack and Rocco Duardo of Saddle Brook – joined two of the officers who filed complaints last summer – Lt. Vincent Riotto of Hackensack and Sgt. Scott Sybel of River Edge – in the latest suit in U.S. District Court in Newark.
The 22-page complaint, which was filed electronically late Wednesday, mirrors the allegations previously raised against the chief and a cadre of allied officers.
“As long as Zisa and his cronies continue to harass and retaliate against my clients for exercising their First Amendment rights, I will continue to bring lawsuits … to defend their rights,” said Mark B. Frost, a Philadelphia attorney who is now representing nine current and former officers in two federal suits against the chief and the city.
The latest complaint alleges that the officers are being harassed and brought up on false charges because of their involvement in or association with plaintiffs in the earlier lawsuits, Frost said today. Thirteen officers are now suing the chief in federal and state court.
Cavallo’s cousin Ralph, and Duardo’s brother, Anthony, were among six plaintiffs, including Sybel and Riotto, who sued the chief, the city and a handful of officers on June 24 alleging civil rights and racketeering violations.
Borntrager, the 100-member department’s lead firearms instructor, claims he was punished for failing to wear his hat – his only instance of discipline in 14 years. That punishment, he alleges, was retaliation for associating with Sybel, his supervisor, and other officers suing the chief and for his unwillingness to donate funds to Zisa and his candidates.
In the two suits filed by Frost and co-counsel John J. Zidziunas of Jersey City, the chief is accused of using his office for financial and political gain by “extorting” money from the ranks of his department to support his candidacy in state Assembly races, as well as candidates for other public and union offices.
Zisa, who was appointed chief in 1995 by his brother, former Mayor Jack Zisa, and served as a state assemblyman from 1994 to 2002, has denied any abuse of office and suggested the allegations were politically motivated attacks by disgruntled officers.
Asked for comment today, Zisa said, “Sounds to me like the same bogus allegations.”
City officials declined to comment, but Stephen Lo Iacono, the city manager, noted the cost of defending any litigation is always a concern.
“Especially in the environment that we are in,” he said. “And again, where these lawsuits are coming from, is an additional concern, and it’s something that we have to deal with.”
The other defendants in the new suit are Captains Thomas Salcedo and Danilo Garcia and Sgt. James Smith. They did not return a message seeking comment.
During the 2008 election for state union delegate, the suit alleges, one captain strode around police headquarters with a sign on his back telegraphing the chief’s favored candidate while a sergeant guarded the ballot box, demanding to see how each officer voted and recording the names of those who refused to divulge their ballot.
Officers were warned that failing to disclose their ballot would be considered a vote against the chief and a show of disloyalty, the suit said.
In other claims, Cavallo said he suffered retaliation from Zisa and Smith after reporting Smith for allegedly making derogatory racial remarks and using excessive force against a Hispanic suspect in an alleged burglary attempt. Cavallo was brought up on charges of using improper tactics, but the allegations were later found to be unwarranted, the suit said.
Duardo claims he was falsely accused of leaving his shift early and subjected to an internal affairs investigation and verbal reprimand by Zisa because of his brother’s participation in the earlier suit. Duardo also alleges he was wrongly brought up on charges of insubordination and lying by Smith.
Riotto and Sybel both cite instances of alleged retaliation in which they were ordered by Salcedo to list medications they use and to provide urine samples, in violation of federal law and state attorney general’s guidelines. The tests came back negative, the suit said.
Sybel also alleges he was wrongly suspended for two days for failing to write up Borntrager for removing his hat when he was sick and had difficulty hearing, according to the suit.
After filing suit in June, Sybel was transferred from patrol to the housing division — “a less desirable position that is used as punishment” — and ordered to work a 3 p.m. to 11 p.m. shift, in a move designed to take time away from his family and other activities, the suit said. He also claims he has been given fewer opportunities to work on special overtime details.
The two-count suit accuses the defendants of violating the officers’ right to free speech and association and alleges city policies and customs encouraged the chief to believe he could violate his officers’ rights with impunity.
The suit seeks an order enjoining the city from continuing such practices as well as unspecified compensatory and punitive damages.
Staff writer Monsy Alvarado contributed to this article. E-mail:sampson@northjersey.com
Page 1 2 >>
Embattled Hackensack Police Chief Ken Zisa has been named in yet another lawsuit, the fourth this year by members of his department, on charges of scheming to extort political contributions and votes, and retaliating against officers who fail to do his bidding.
Three new plaintiffs – Officers Allen Borntrager of Midland Park, Frank Cavallo of Hackensack and Rocco Duardo of Saddle Brook – joined two of the officers who filed complaints last summer – Lt. Vincent Riotto of Hackensack and Sgt. Scott Sybel of River Edge – in the latest suit in U.S. District Court in Newark.
The 22-page complaint, which was filed electronically late Wednesday, mirrors the allegations previously raised against the chief and a cadre of allied officers.
“As long as Zisa and his cronies continue to harass and retaliate against my clients for exercising their First Amendment rights, I will continue to bring lawsuits … to defend their rights,” said Mark B. Frost, a Philadelphia attorney who is now representing nine current and former officers in two federal suits against the chief and the city.
The latest complaint alleges that the officers are being harassed and brought up on false charges because of their involvement in or association with plaintiffs in the earlier lawsuits, Frost said today. Thirteen officers are now suing the chief in federal and state court.
Cavallo’s cousin Ralph, and Duardo’s brother, Anthony, were among six plaintiffs, including Sybel and Riotto, who sued the chief, the city and a handful of officers on June 24 alleging civil rights and racketeering violations.
Borntrager, the 100-member department’s lead firearms instructor, claims he was punished for failing to wear his hat – his only instance of discipline in 14 years. That punishment, he alleges, was retaliation for associating with Sybel, his supervisor, and other officers suing the chief and for his unwillingness to donate funds to Zisa and his candidates.
In the two suits filed by Frost and co-counsel John J. Zidziunas of Jersey City, the chief is accused of using his office for financial and political gain by “extorting” money from the ranks of his department to support his candidacy in state Assembly races, as well as candidates for other public and union offices.
Zisa, who was appointed chief in 1995 by his brother, former Mayor Jack Zisa, and served as a state assemblyman from 1994 to 2002, has denied any abuse of office and suggested the allegations were politically motivated attacks by disgruntled officers.
Asked for comment today, Zisa said, “Sounds to me like the same bogus allegations.”
City officials declined to comment, but Stephen Lo Iacono, the city manager, noted the cost of defending any litigation is always a concern.
“Especially in the environment that we are in,” he said. “And again, where these lawsuits are coming from, is an additional concern, and it’s something that we have to deal with.”
The other defendants in the new suit are Captains Thomas Salcedo and Danilo Garcia and Sgt. James Smith. They did not return a message seeking comment.
During the 2008 election for state union delegate, the suit alleges, one captain strode around police headquarters with a sign on his back telegraphing the chief’s favored candidate while a sergeant guarded the ballot box, demanding to see how each officer voted and recording the names of those who refused to divulge their ballot.
Officers were warned that failing to disclose their ballot would be considered a vote against the chief and a show of disloyalty, the suit said.
In other claims, Cavallo said he suffered retaliation from Zisa and Smith after reporting Smith for allegedly making derogatory racial remarks and using excessive force against a Hispanic suspect in an alleged burglary attempt. Cavallo was brought up on charges of using improper tactics, but the allegations were later found to be unwarranted, the suit said.
Duardo claims he was falsely accused of leaving his shift early and subjected to an internal affairs investigation and verbal reprimand by Zisa because of his brother’s participation in the earlier suit. Duardo also alleges he was wrongly brought up on charges of insubordination and lying by Smith.
Riotto and Sybel both cite instances of alleged retaliation in which they were ordered by Salcedo to list medications they use and to provide urine samples, in violation of federal law and state attorney general’s guidelines. The tests came back negative, the suit said.
Sybel also alleges he was wrongly suspended for two days for failing to write up Borntrager for removing his hat when he was sick and had difficulty hearing, according to the suit.
After filing suit in June, Sybel was transferred from patrol to the housing division — “a less desirable position that is used as punishment” — and ordered to work a 3 p.m. to 11 p.m. shift, in a move designed to take time away from his family and other activities, the suit said. He also claims he has been given fewer opportunities to work on special overtime details.
The two-count suit accuses the defendants of violating the officers’ right to free speech and association and alleges city policies and customs encouraged the chief to believe he could violate his officers’ rights with impunity.
The suit seeks an order enjoining the city from continuing such practices as well as unspecified compensatory and punitive damages.
Staff writer Monsy Alvarado contributed to this article. E-mail:sampson@northjersey.com
Tuesday, December 22, 2009
New Cultural Arts Center
If the City buys the old Masonic Temple to use as the new Cultural Arts Center, are they going to sell the old center to pay off the bonds they are planning to float for the purchase?
Thursday, December 17, 2009
More News That Involves Hackensack
Seems that questionable ethics issues usually have a Hackensack link. Maybe the firm that recommended changes at HUMC could come in and give our City Departments some suggestions.
http://www.northjersey.com/recap/121509_Top_Bergen_County_detective_moonlighted_for_Hackensack_University_Medical_Center.html
http://www.northjersey.com/recap/121509_Top_Bergen_County_detective_moonlighted_for_Hackensack_University_Medical_Center.html
Friday, December 11, 2009
Hackensack in The News
Several articles today about Hackensack - busy, busy, busy
EMT's - Ironic how City Manager says mutual aid is one of the reasons this is working out "very well". Isn't the fact that mutual aid was not figured into the numbers the reason he said we went over the cap? Spin, Spin, Spin
http://www.northjersey.com/news/79032267.html
Officer Ferraioli's article
http://www.northjersey.com/news/79030552.html
Officer Ferraioli's Internal Affairs Hearing
http://www.northjersey.com/news/121009_Officer_denied_ability_to_talk_to_attorney_while_handing_over_home_computer.html
Sorry, missed this one in original post. Way to go HFD!
http://www.northjersey.com/news/79030822.html
EMT's - Ironic how City Manager says mutual aid is one of the reasons this is working out "very well". Isn't the fact that mutual aid was not figured into the numbers the reason he said we went over the cap? Spin, Spin, Spin
http://www.northjersey.com/news/79032267.html
Officer Ferraioli's article
http://www.northjersey.com/news/79030552.html
Officer Ferraioli's Internal Affairs Hearing
http://www.northjersey.com/news/121009_Officer_denied_ability_to_talk_to_attorney_while_handing_over_home_computer.html
Sorry, missed this one in original post. Way to go HFD!
http://www.northjersey.com/news/79030822.html
Wednesday, December 9, 2009
12/7 & 12/8 meetings
No video of COW meeting available. Wish there was because there were a couple of issues of interest.
If I get the Council video it will be posted here. The actual business was rather mundane. But it is apparent that they all need to get thicker skin. One of the council members complained that when he was elected he didn't expect the "verbal abuse" from the public and doesn't like it. That's life in big city politics. If you don't like it, resign. Also, after the meeting was over and the public video taping was done, the city clerk was yelling about freedom of speech. Priceless! Wish that was on video.
It's interesting to note that it seems they all are very cognizant of the public taping of these meetings, especially the city clerk. To the best of my knowledge, the city clerk should not address a citizen during the public portion, unless she is specifically asked a question , or, in the case of Hackensack meetings, has the mayor's permission. She jumped down some one's throat about what supposedly happened at the COW. She apparently took offense at something that was said during that meeting.
It seems that at the COW a resident who is very vocal got under their skin. They consider him rude and disruptive. He may not have the best people skills, but neither do they. They really should look in the mirror. When this person said he's on medication, the city attorney thought it was appropriate to say "Apparently not enough". And then he wanted it put on the record that this person needs more medication. What the ... Also when this person was told his 5 minute time was up, he said "A lot of peoples' time is up". One council member apparently took that as a threat and asked that it be put on the record, except he twisted the words. Someone should really should check the minutes of that meeting and see what exactly is on the record.
A small item of interest at the COW is that the "routine" renewal of Bergen Risk as third party administrator was scheduled to be on the 12/8 Council Agenda. Apparently the city attorney had second thoughts about this and informed the city manager that it needed to be advertised on the website. Which it now is, at http://www.hackensack.org/controls/eventview.aspx?MODE=SINGLE&ID=480 BUT with a 12/1 date. Guess it wasn't so routine. Wonder what made them do it correctly this time and why they back dated the notice.
Also at the COW a council member specifically asked that research be done regarding a particular person's attendance at all meetings - whether it be to ban him or have extra security is not clear. And she asked what other meetings he goes to. Apparently, he was in the vicinity of the Shade Tree meeting and someone reported to the council that they were supposedly scared by him. It seems that a family member of one of our leaders is on that board and possibly she is the one who made that request. Sure, have the city attorney research that ... we'll see how that ends up.
Why does this matter? Because if they can target him, they can target any one of us that they do not like. How would you like to have special security at every meeting you attend? Do you want to have to pay for the city attorney to research this and for the special security?
To be clear, I am not saying that this person has model behavior - but he does not appear to be a physical threat to anyone. There are options other than to ban him from meetings or follow him around and antagonize him. Doesn't our council (and our police dept) have anything better to be concerned about?
If I get the Council video it will be posted here. The actual business was rather mundane. But it is apparent that they all need to get thicker skin. One of the council members complained that when he was elected he didn't expect the "verbal abuse" from the public and doesn't like it. That's life in big city politics. If you don't like it, resign. Also, after the meeting was over and the public video taping was done, the city clerk was yelling about freedom of speech. Priceless! Wish that was on video.
It's interesting to note that it seems they all are very cognizant of the public taping of these meetings, especially the city clerk. To the best of my knowledge, the city clerk should not address a citizen during the public portion, unless she is specifically asked a question , or, in the case of Hackensack meetings, has the mayor's permission. She jumped down some one's throat about what supposedly happened at the COW. She apparently took offense at something that was said during that meeting.
It seems that at the COW a resident who is very vocal got under their skin. They consider him rude and disruptive. He may not have the best people skills, but neither do they. They really should look in the mirror. When this person said he's on medication, the city attorney thought it was appropriate to say "Apparently not enough". And then he wanted it put on the record that this person needs more medication. What the ... Also when this person was told his 5 minute time was up, he said "A lot of peoples' time is up". One council member apparently took that as a threat and asked that it be put on the record, except he twisted the words. Someone should really should check the minutes of that meeting and see what exactly is on the record.
A small item of interest at the COW is that the "routine" renewal of Bergen Risk as third party administrator was scheduled to be on the 12/8 Council Agenda. Apparently the city attorney had second thoughts about this and informed the city manager that it needed to be advertised on the website. Which it now is, at http://www.hackensack.org/controls/eventview.aspx?MODE=SINGLE&ID=480 BUT with a 12/1 date. Guess it wasn't so routine. Wonder what made them do it correctly this time and why they back dated the notice.
Also at the COW a council member specifically asked that research be done regarding a particular person's attendance at all meetings - whether it be to ban him or have extra security is not clear. And she asked what other meetings he goes to. Apparently, he was in the vicinity of the Shade Tree meeting and someone reported to the council that they were supposedly scared by him. It seems that a family member of one of our leaders is on that board and possibly she is the one who made that request. Sure, have the city attorney research that ... we'll see how that ends up.
Why does this matter? Because if they can target him, they can target any one of us that they do not like. How would you like to have special security at every meeting you attend? Do you want to have to pay for the city attorney to research this and for the special security?
To be clear, I am not saying that this person has model behavior - but he does not appear to be a physical threat to anyone. There are options other than to ban him from meetings or follow him around and antagonize him. Doesn't our council (and our police dept) have anything better to be concerned about?
Tuesday, December 8, 2009
2010 Council Meetings
Starting in January the Committee of the Whole and Council Meeting will be on the same night - Tuesdays at 6:30 & 8:00. Make one of your Resolutions for 2010 to attend more City meetings.
The schedule is available on the City website
http://www.hackensack.org/filestorage/43/94/2010_Meeting_schedule.doc
The schedule is available on the City website
http://www.hackensack.org/filestorage/43/94/2010_Meeting_schedule.doc
Friday, December 4, 2009
Zisa Speaks Out
This was in Hackensack Chronicle today.
http://www.northjersey.com/news/78493717.html?c=y&page=2
Kudos to Mark Bonamo for getting the interview.
With regard to the pending internal affiars matter:
"It really doesn’t matter whether or not the guidelines are formally adopted," said Zisa. "What matters is the conduct of the officer, and the way that the investigation was handled by the department."
Any thoughts on this quote, or anything else in the article?
And on a related matter
Cop is denied subpoenas
Saturday, December 5, 2009
BY MONSY ALVARADO
The Record
STAFF WRITER
0 Comments HACKENSACK — City Manager Stephen Lo Iacono ruled this week that he will not issue subpoenas for an ongoing policeman's disciplinary hearing that were requested by the officer's attorney.
In his ruling, Lo Iacono, who is serving as the hearing officer in the proceedings, said he could not issue the subpoenas because he needed more information about the subject of the witnesses' testimony. He said that without the information, it would be "impossible to evaluate whether such testimony is relevant, privileged, or in any other way improper."
Patrick Toscano, who is representing Officer Anthony Ferraioli, said the ruling shows the city manager is not being impartial. He has requested that Lo Iacono recuse himself as the hearing officer.
"There is no doubt on this end that no matter what the evidence reveals, you will rule against my client,'' Toscano wrote in a letter addressed to Lo Iacono. "Your latest ruling denying my request to subpoena and produce witnesses who will undoubtedly clear my client of all of these specious charges is a vagrant disregard for his procedural and substantive due process rights."
Lo Iacono, who has an attorney advising him on the proceedings, declined to comment Friday, saying he cannot speak about the hearing.
Toscano wanted Lo Iacono to issue a dozen subpoenas calling witnesses to either testify or produce documents or videotapes for the hearing.
Ferraioli, who is suspended with pay, is accused of posing as an internal affairs captain in an online forum. Chief Ken Zisa, who is among those Toscano wants to subpoena, has filed several administrative charges against Ferraioli. The officer could lose his job if he is found guilty.
During the first day of hearings, Toscano said it was Ferraioli's girlfriend who was responsible for the postings, and that the case should be dismissed.
The subpoena issue dates back to September, when Toscano sent the subpoenas. But Philip George, the counsel representing the Hackensack Police Department in the matter, objected to the subpoenas, saying they were improperly issued and sought irrelevant information. Last month, Lo Iacono quashed the subpoenas, writing in his opinion that Toscano lacked the authority to issue them, and that only the hearing officer can send them in such cases.
The decision prompted Toscano to ask Lo Iacono to serve the subpoenas.
This is the second time that Toscano has asked Lo Iacono to withdraw from hearing the case. In September, Toscano argued that Lo Iacono was in conflict because as city manager he has a working relationship with Zisa. But Lo Iacono denied the motion, telling Toscano he would be fair.
Ferraioli's disciplinary hearing is scheduled to resume at 9 a.m. on Thursday.
E-mail: alvarado@northjersey.com
HACKENSACK — City Manager Stephen Lo Iacono ruled this week that he will not issue subpoenas for an ongoing policeman's disciplinary hearing that were requested by the officer's attorney.
In his ruling, Lo Iacono, who is serving as the hearing officer in the proceedings, said he could not issue the subpoenas because he needed more information about the subject of the witnesses' testimony. He said that without the information, it would be "impossible to evaluate whether such testimony is relevant, privileged, or in any other way improper."
Patrick Toscano, who is representing Officer Anthony Ferraioli, said the ruling shows the city manager is not being impartial. He has requested that Lo Iacono recuse himself as the hearing officer.
"There is no doubt on this end that no matter what the evidence reveals, you will rule against my client,'' Toscano wrote in a letter addressed to Lo Iacono. "Your latest ruling denying my request to subpoena and produce witnesses who will undoubtedly clear my client of all of these specious charges is a vagrant disregard for his procedural and substantive due process rights."
Lo Iacono, who has an attorney advising him on the proceedings, declined to comment Friday, saying he cannot speak about the hearing.
Toscano wanted Lo Iacono to issue a dozen subpoenas calling witnesses to either testify or produce documents or videotapes for the hearing.
Ferraioli, who is suspended with pay, is accused of posing as an internal affairs captain in an online forum. Chief Ken Zisa, who is among those Toscano wants to subpoena, has filed several administrative charges against Ferraioli. The officer could lose his job if he is found guilty.
During the first day of hearings, Toscano said it was Ferraioli's girlfriend who was responsible for the postings, and that the case should be dismissed.
The subpoena issue dates back to September, when Toscano sent the subpoenas. But Philip George, the counsel representing the Hackensack Police Department in the matter, objected to the subpoenas, saying they were improperly issued and sought irrelevant information. Last month, Lo Iacono quashed the subpoenas, writing in his opinion that Toscano lacked the authority to issue them, and that only the hearing officer can send them in such cases.
The decision prompted Toscano to ask Lo Iacono to serve the subpoenas.
This is the second time that Toscano has asked Lo Iacono to withdraw from hearing the case. In September, Toscano argued that Lo Iacono was in conflict because as city manager he has a working relationship with Zisa. But Lo Iacono denied the motion, telling Toscano he would be fair.
Ferraioli's disciplinary hearing is scheduled to resume at 9 a.m. on Thursday.
E-mail: alvarado@northjersey.com
http://www.northjersey.com/news/78493717.html?c=y&page=2
Kudos to Mark Bonamo for getting the interview.
With regard to the pending internal affiars matter:
"It really doesn’t matter whether or not the guidelines are formally adopted," said Zisa. "What matters is the conduct of the officer, and the way that the investigation was handled by the department."
Any thoughts on this quote, or anything else in the article?
And on a related matter
Cop is denied subpoenas
Saturday, December 5, 2009
BY MONSY ALVARADO
The Record
STAFF WRITER
0 Comments HACKENSACK — City Manager Stephen Lo Iacono ruled this week that he will not issue subpoenas for an ongoing policeman's disciplinary hearing that were requested by the officer's attorney.
In his ruling, Lo Iacono, who is serving as the hearing officer in the proceedings, said he could not issue the subpoenas because he needed more information about the subject of the witnesses' testimony. He said that without the information, it would be "impossible to evaluate whether such testimony is relevant, privileged, or in any other way improper."
Patrick Toscano, who is representing Officer Anthony Ferraioli, said the ruling shows the city manager is not being impartial. He has requested that Lo Iacono recuse himself as the hearing officer.
"There is no doubt on this end that no matter what the evidence reveals, you will rule against my client,'' Toscano wrote in a letter addressed to Lo Iacono. "Your latest ruling denying my request to subpoena and produce witnesses who will undoubtedly clear my client of all of these specious charges is a vagrant disregard for his procedural and substantive due process rights."
Lo Iacono, who has an attorney advising him on the proceedings, declined to comment Friday, saying he cannot speak about the hearing.
Toscano wanted Lo Iacono to issue a dozen subpoenas calling witnesses to either testify or produce documents or videotapes for the hearing.
Ferraioli, who is suspended with pay, is accused of posing as an internal affairs captain in an online forum. Chief Ken Zisa, who is among those Toscano wants to subpoena, has filed several administrative charges against Ferraioli. The officer could lose his job if he is found guilty.
During the first day of hearings, Toscano said it was Ferraioli's girlfriend who was responsible for the postings, and that the case should be dismissed.
The subpoena issue dates back to September, when Toscano sent the subpoenas. But Philip George, the counsel representing the Hackensack Police Department in the matter, objected to the subpoenas, saying they were improperly issued and sought irrelevant information. Last month, Lo Iacono quashed the subpoenas, writing in his opinion that Toscano lacked the authority to issue them, and that only the hearing officer can send them in such cases.
The decision prompted Toscano to ask Lo Iacono to serve the subpoenas.
This is the second time that Toscano has asked Lo Iacono to withdraw from hearing the case. In September, Toscano argued that Lo Iacono was in conflict because as city manager he has a working relationship with Zisa. But Lo Iacono denied the motion, telling Toscano he would be fair.
Ferraioli's disciplinary hearing is scheduled to resume at 9 a.m. on Thursday.
E-mail: alvarado@northjersey.com
HACKENSACK — City Manager Stephen Lo Iacono ruled this week that he will not issue subpoenas for an ongoing policeman's disciplinary hearing that were requested by the officer's attorney.
In his ruling, Lo Iacono, who is serving as the hearing officer in the proceedings, said he could not issue the subpoenas because he needed more information about the subject of the witnesses' testimony. He said that without the information, it would be "impossible to evaluate whether such testimony is relevant, privileged, or in any other way improper."
Patrick Toscano, who is representing Officer Anthony Ferraioli, said the ruling shows the city manager is not being impartial. He has requested that Lo Iacono recuse himself as the hearing officer.
"There is no doubt on this end that no matter what the evidence reveals, you will rule against my client,'' Toscano wrote in a letter addressed to Lo Iacono. "Your latest ruling denying my request to subpoena and produce witnesses who will undoubtedly clear my client of all of these specious charges is a vagrant disregard for his procedural and substantive due process rights."
Lo Iacono, who has an attorney advising him on the proceedings, declined to comment Friday, saying he cannot speak about the hearing.
Toscano wanted Lo Iacono to issue a dozen subpoenas calling witnesses to either testify or produce documents or videotapes for the hearing.
Ferraioli, who is suspended with pay, is accused of posing as an internal affairs captain in an online forum. Chief Ken Zisa, who is among those Toscano wants to subpoena, has filed several administrative charges against Ferraioli. The officer could lose his job if he is found guilty.
During the first day of hearings, Toscano said it was Ferraioli's girlfriend who was responsible for the postings, and that the case should be dismissed.
The subpoena issue dates back to September, when Toscano sent the subpoenas. But Philip George, the counsel representing the Hackensack Police Department in the matter, objected to the subpoenas, saying they were improperly issued and sought irrelevant information. Last month, Lo Iacono quashed the subpoenas, writing in his opinion that Toscano lacked the authority to issue them, and that only the hearing officer can send them in such cases.
The decision prompted Toscano to ask Lo Iacono to serve the subpoenas.
This is the second time that Toscano has asked Lo Iacono to withdraw from hearing the case. In September, Toscano argued that Lo Iacono was in conflict because as city manager he has a working relationship with Zisa. But Lo Iacono denied the motion, telling Toscano he would be fair.
Ferraioli's disciplinary hearing is scheduled to resume at 9 a.m. on Thursday.
E-mail: alvarado@northjersey.com
Tuesday, December 1, 2009
Odds & Ends ... and maybe some rambling
Fox 5 is supposed to do Part II. Don't know when. I've heard that the City is upset that the media got a hold of the tape and is taking action involving the television station. Don't know if that's true. But it seems to me that the citizens would be better served if the City took some action regarding what was heard on the tape rather than how the media got the tape. Kind of like shooting the messenger.
Also heard that more subpoenas are being issued - for what and who I don't know. But, I do know that citizens will be footing the bill for any additional attorneys that are hired. And those attorneys should be looking out for the best interests of the citizens of Hackensack, not necessarily for the individual who has been served.
According to the County Seat there are "Nearly 1,000 New Hospital Parking Spots" in the new garage. Well that's one way not to get pinned down to a number. Are there 1,000, 700, or 900 - what's the best guess today? The reason it matters is that the formula for determining the air rights fee is based on the number of parking spaces. The City is not getting taxes for this property because the hospital is running it, not a 3rd party. So, the air rights are in lieu of taxes. We should be getting both!
The way the County Seat article on the 2nd Ward Town Hall meeting reads, I'd think the reporter was at a different meeting. If you'll notice, 3/4 of the article is about what the City reps had to say and only 1/4 is devoted to the citizens' issues. It also says "These were addressed by the council and Zisa". If by "addressed" it is meant that a non-answer was given, then yes they were addressed. But to me addressed means that a solution was arrived at, or it was promised that it will be. No answers, no solutions. Same old song and dance.
By the way, as I recall, it was Citizens For Change that pledged to address issues within each Ward, not the 4 incumbs.
Christmas Tree Lighting (I don't have to call it a "Holiday Tree" do I?) is Monday, December 7th at 5:30 pm at Courthouse Green.
Restaurant Week starts Friday, December 4th - check uppermain.org for participating restaurants. There will be a Trolley on Main (might just take the free ride)
COW follows tree lighting ceremony on 12/7
Council Meeting 12/8
Happy shopping to all!
Also heard that more subpoenas are being issued - for what and who I don't know. But, I do know that citizens will be footing the bill for any additional attorneys that are hired. And those attorneys should be looking out for the best interests of the citizens of Hackensack, not necessarily for the individual who has been served.
According to the County Seat there are "Nearly 1,000 New Hospital Parking Spots" in the new garage. Well that's one way not to get pinned down to a number. Are there 1,000, 700, or 900 - what's the best guess today? The reason it matters is that the formula for determining the air rights fee is based on the number of parking spaces. The City is not getting taxes for this property because the hospital is running it, not a 3rd party. So, the air rights are in lieu of taxes. We should be getting both!
The way the County Seat article on the 2nd Ward Town Hall meeting reads, I'd think the reporter was at a different meeting. If you'll notice, 3/4 of the article is about what the City reps had to say and only 1/4 is devoted to the citizens' issues. It also says "These were addressed by the council and Zisa". If by "addressed" it is meant that a non-answer was given, then yes they were addressed. But to me addressed means that a solution was arrived at, or it was promised that it will be. No answers, no solutions. Same old song and dance.
By the way, as I recall, it was Citizens For Change that pledged to address issues within each Ward, not the 4 incumbs.
Christmas Tree Lighting (I don't have to call it a "Holiday Tree" do I?) is Monday, December 7th at 5:30 pm at Courthouse Green.
Restaurant Week starts Friday, December 4th - check uppermain.org for participating restaurants. There will be a Trolley on Main (might just take the free ride)
COW follows tree lighting ceremony on 12/7
Council Meeting 12/8
Happy shopping to all!
Friday, November 27, 2009
Really?
In today's Chronicle article City Manager says that residents weren't really using the parking spaces on Prospect. Really? So the 2 handicapped women who were at the meeting and told you that they use those spots were lying? Come on Mr. LoIacono, you can't really mean that.
How about the FACT that the Developer's Agreement with the hospital was never once mentioned by the Council or City Manager at the meeting when this was voted upon?
Or this quote from Mr. LoIacono -"This is a decision that is entirely based on safety and traffic". That would be untrue, in my opinion, when the genesis for this decision was a Developer's Agreement, not a traffic study.
How about the FACT that the Developer's Agreement with the hospital was never once mentioned by the Council or City Manager at the meeting when this was voted upon?
Or this quote from Mr. LoIacono -"This is a decision that is entirely based on safety and traffic". That would be untrue, in my opinion, when the genesis for this decision was a Developer's Agreement, not a traffic study.
Tuesday, November 24, 2009
2nd Ward Town Hall Meeting
There were nice presentations from Health Dept (get your flu shot), Boys' & Girls' Club (programs for kids), Recreation Dept (expanding adult/senior programs), Police Dept (volunteer for programs), about rehab of Polifly Park and USDA rep about goose problems.
Questions were varied - briefly, they were:
Illegal (basement) apartments - call building department
Stony Hill hotel - no details yet. Owner is negotiating with chains. Nothing to report.
Recycling electronics - senior citizens should call DPW to pick up for free.
Traffic coming off Summit onto side streets - hopefully will be looked into.
Waive permit fee for sidewalk repair violations - probably not
Will mayor's chair rotate again - probably
Commercial vehicles parked in residential area - call Chief if police don't respond
Taxes - "economy of scales" (can someone tell me what that means?)
No comment on Fox 5 report except - lawsuits are without merit & "vigourously defending", there is no policy regarding civilians in police vehicles - it is not discouraged, suing police department is growing trend
Parking on Prospect between Essex & Atlantic - residents can register to get a parking sticker (didn't Mayor say no stickers at last council meeting - it's on the tape) to park for free from 6pm to 8am in the garage. If you're home during any other hours, guess you're out of luck. If you want a dedicated space 24/7, you can get a monthly spot for $25/mo. Residents should be getting a letter in the mail.
Did I miss anything?
Questions were varied - briefly, they were:
Illegal (basement) apartments - call building department
Stony Hill hotel - no details yet. Owner is negotiating with chains. Nothing to report.
Recycling electronics - senior citizens should call DPW to pick up for free.
Traffic coming off Summit onto side streets - hopefully will be looked into.
Waive permit fee for sidewalk repair violations - probably not
Will mayor's chair rotate again - probably
Commercial vehicles parked in residential area - call Chief if police don't respond
Taxes - "economy of scales" (can someone tell me what that means?)
No comment on Fox 5 report except - lawsuits are without merit & "vigourously defending", there is no policy regarding civilians in police vehicles - it is not discouraged, suing police department is growing trend
Parking on Prospect between Essex & Atlantic - residents can register to get a parking sticker (didn't Mayor say no stickers at last council meeting - it's on the tape) to park for free from 6pm to 8am in the garage. If you're home during any other hours, guess you're out of luck. If you want a dedicated space 24/7, you can get a monthly spot for $25/mo. Residents should be getting a letter in the mail.
Did I miss anything?
Saturday, November 21, 2009
Fox 5 Report
This week Fox 5 aired an investigative report on Hackensack Police Department. The tape that was played was really disturbing to most people. Makes you wonder how many times things like this happen and the conversation was not recorded.
Police get suspended for things like using the wrong radio and other minor infractions. If there is not action taken regarding the Captain using a city vehicle to transport his child (in the front seat) and being dressed like he's going to play softball while driving the vehicle, then point proven regarding favoritism and retaliation. Let's see what, if anything, happens.
The video can be viewed here:
http://www.myfoxny.com/subindex/news/investigative Hackensack Shakedown?
Police get suspended for things like using the wrong radio and other minor infractions. If there is not action taken regarding the Captain using a city vehicle to transport his child (in the front seat) and being dressed like he's going to play softball while driving the vehicle, then point proven regarding favoritism and retaliation. Let's see what, if anything, happens.
The video can be viewed here:
http://www.myfoxny.com/subindex/news/investigative Hackensack Shakedown?
Wednesday, November 18, 2009
League of Municipalities is this week
So, if you notice little less activity around City Hall and other sites, that's why.
http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2009/11/more_than_20k_nj_lawmakers_exp.html
I think administration should give a full report on any workshops they attended and I hope that a few of them attended open government, public meetings or public records workshops if they were offered.
http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2009/11/more_than_20k_nj_lawmakers_exp.html
I think administration should give a full report on any workshops they attended and I hope that a few of them attended open government, public meetings or public records workshops if they were offered.
Sunday, November 15, 2009
November 10 Council Meeting
Because of the lenght of this week's meeting (2 1/2 hours) the video is in 5 posts. Read posts from bottom to top - use menu on the left to read in order. The video is in order from top to bottom within each post.
The video has to be cut & compressed to fit on this site. If someone has another site to post this on, please leave the info as a comment.
The video has to be cut & compressed to fit on this site. If someone has another site to post this on, please leave the info as a comment.
November 10 Council Meeting Part IV
Consent Agenda Items (Res 396-09 thru 418-09)
396 Use of North Arlington Pistol Range
397 St Paul's Lodge Club License
398 Public Health Priority Funding
399 Hazardous Discharge Site Remediation Grant
400 2010 State Health Services Grant
401 & 402 Edward Byrne Memorial Grants from Paramus
403 Community Dev Block Grant - Foschini Park
404 Tax Refunds
405 Green Acres Grant - 2nd Ward Park
406 NJ Transit Rail Line (opposition to current Passaic Bergen Light Rail Plan)
407 2007 Recycling Tonnage Grant
408 Esplanade Park Improvements (from HUMC $1mil)
409 Administrative Officers Contract - HPD
410 Lease of 155 Hudson St for satellite police station
411 Developer's Agreement - Denholtz 30 Woodridge Ave child care center
412 Sale at auction of 163 Liberty St
413 Agreement with MICCOM EMS Call Screening
414 No Further Action Letter Green Acres Johnson Park Riverwalk
415 Comm Dev Block Grant Applications
416 Individual Tax Interest Refund
417 Authorization for Issuance of Alcoholic Beverage Card
418 Area in need of Redevelopment 414 Hackensack Ave
Consent Agenda & Public Comments Part I
396 Use of North Arlington Pistol Range
397 St Paul's Lodge Club License
398 Public Health Priority Funding
399 Hazardous Discharge Site Remediation Grant
400 2010 State Health Services Grant
401 & 402 Edward Byrne Memorial Grants from Paramus
403 Community Dev Block Grant - Foschini Park
404 Tax Refunds
405 Green Acres Grant - 2nd Ward Park
406 NJ Transit Rail Line (opposition to current Passaic Bergen Light Rail Plan)
407 2007 Recycling Tonnage Grant
408 Esplanade Park Improvements (from HUMC $1mil)
409 Administrative Officers Contract - HPD
410 Lease of 155 Hudson St for satellite police station
411 Developer's Agreement - Denholtz 30 Woodridge Ave child care center
412 Sale at auction of 163 Liberty St
413 Agreement with MICCOM EMS Call Screening
414 No Further Action Letter Green Acres Johnson Park Riverwalk
415 Comm Dev Block Grant Applications
416 Individual Tax Interest Refund
417 Authorization for Issuance of Alcoholic Beverage Card
418 Area in need of Redevelopment 414 Hackensack Ave
Consent Agenda & Public Comments Part I
Public Comments & Air Rights
Public Comments & Air Rights
Public Comments & Air Rights
The rest of the public comments will be on the next post
November 10 Council Meeting Part III
No Parking on Prospect continued
There is a technical issue with the next part of the video. It will be posted when the issue is resolved. (It has been posted - last video on Part II) Video continues after that section.
At this part a grad student spoke but it was not on the parking ordinance
No Parking Comments continued
Last section with regard to Prospect parking
First Readings to be voted on 12/8
Resolutions 387 & 388
387 - Permit required for Storage Containers
388 - Parking Meter Change to uniform amounts
Resolutions 389 thru 395
389 - Air Rights HUMC bridges
390 - $2,000,000 Sewer Repairs
$1,900,000 Bond
391 - Public Defender App Fee to $200
392 - Handicapped Parking Space 475 Colonial
393 - Handicapped Parking Space 230 Polifly
394 - Handicapped Parking Space 12 Frederick
395 - Payment of Bills
Current Fund $16,442,926.58
Grants 157.86
Payroll 266,684.76
Self Insurance 157,353.94
Public Parking 20,484.98
Capital 454,456.41
Trust Account 53,309.59
Saturday, November 14, 2009
November 10 Council Meeting Part II
More No Parking on Prospect - this is in several parts
Total for this ordinance was about an hour
Total for this ordinance was about an hour
continued on next post
November 10 Hackensack City Council Part I
This was a long meeting (2 1/2 hours) and I can't fit all the video on one post. The rest of the video will be posted tomorrow.
Meeting Opening
No Parking on Prospect
Meeting Opening
Arcadia Road Improvements
Arcadia Road comments
No Parking on Prospect
Wednesday, November 11, 2009
Parking on Prospect
SEE CORRECTION*
Last night the City approved eliminating all parking on Prospect between Atlantic & Essex (vote was 4 to 1). This is despite the fact that the City has made no provisions for handicapped parking for the residents of the apartments and that they have not finalized the arrangements for resident parking. Are residents who live in those apartments going to have to pay to park at their own homes?
The reason given for this decision was "safety issues", although nobody presented a single shred of evidence as to what those safety issues might be - even when asked. And the council was asked many questions, for about an hour, and did not come up with satisfactory answers and sometimes the only response was just blank stares.
What was not said by the Mayor or City Manager is that last night they were merely putting a rubber stamp on the decision that was made over a year and half ago to eliminate the parking upon the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy for the Cancer Center parking garage. It is in the Developer's Agreement that was signed in February 2008.
Further, there are going to be turn restrictions at the garage - right turn only. So the residents on Prospect will have to come from First or Second to turn into the garage. I believe, since the wording in the agreement is "provide for ingress and egress to the Parking Garage by right turn only" that all traffic leaving the garage will then be funnelled out onto Prospect. Yup, that's going to relieve traffic on that street.
It appears that all of this is only going to make it more difficult for the residents of those apartments. Why are they doing this?
This could be why. Also in the Developer's Agreement (page 3, paragraph 5 and page 4, paragraph 6) is wording that clearly states the City's intention to acquire 64 Prospect "(i)n order to accomplish the improvements at and in the vicinity of the intersection of Prospect Avenue and Atlantic Street". Basically it says that HUMC will try to acquire this property on its own. If it cannot do that, "the City agrees to issue an offer letter pursuant to the Eminent Domain Act and thereafter to utilize its power to acquire". At paragraph 6 it states "If the parcel is acquired by HUMC without the need for condemnation, the parcel shall be conveyed to the City for nominal consideration"
* CORRECTION - ONLY PART OF THE PROPERTY IS COVETED BY THE CITY, BUT WHICH PART? AGREEMENT DOES NOT SPECIFY.
Clearly, the reason for eliminating the parking is not as simple as a "safety issue". I guess it could be stretched to make that argument because all of the development by the hospital has created an unsafe residential environment. The real reason seems to be because the City entered into this agreement with HUMC and must abide by it - tenants be damned. Since the City provided no proof of any other reason, the wording of the Developer's Agreement is all I have to go on.
The fact that neither the Mayor nor City Manager (the only 2 permitted to speak according to Mayor's rules) mentioned this agreement as the reason for the ordinance makes me wonder if they even know this. If they do know it and did not state that when asked about it, well, in my opinion, that would be a lie of omission. Shame on you, Mr. Mayor & City Manager.
This is going to make it difficult for people who live there to find free parking and, as of right now, there is no provision for handicapped parking. But that seems to be the least of their problems because now the bigger question is, are the residents of 64 Prospect going to be forced out of their homes?
Last night the City approved eliminating all parking on Prospect between Atlantic & Essex (vote was 4 to 1). This is despite the fact that the City has made no provisions for handicapped parking for the residents of the apartments and that they have not finalized the arrangements for resident parking. Are residents who live in those apartments going to have to pay to park at their own homes?
The reason given for this decision was "safety issues", although nobody presented a single shred of evidence as to what those safety issues might be - even when asked. And the council was asked many questions, for about an hour, and did not come up with satisfactory answers and sometimes the only response was just blank stares.
What was not said by the Mayor or City Manager is that last night they were merely putting a rubber stamp on the decision that was made over a year and half ago to eliminate the parking upon the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy for the Cancer Center parking garage. It is in the Developer's Agreement that was signed in February 2008.
Further, there are going to be turn restrictions at the garage - right turn only. So the residents on Prospect will have to come from First or Second to turn into the garage. I believe, since the wording in the agreement is "provide for ingress and egress to the Parking Garage by right turn only" that all traffic leaving the garage will then be funnelled out onto Prospect. Yup, that's going to relieve traffic on that street.
It appears that all of this is only going to make it more difficult for the residents of those apartments. Why are they doing this?
This could be why. Also in the Developer's Agreement (page 3, paragraph 5 and page 4, paragraph 6) is wording that clearly states the City's intention to acquire 64 Prospect "(i)n order to accomplish the improvements at and in the vicinity of the intersection of Prospect Avenue and Atlantic Street". Basically it says that HUMC will try to acquire this property on its own. If it cannot do that, "the City agrees to issue an offer letter pursuant to the Eminent Domain Act and thereafter to utilize its power to acquire". At paragraph 6 it states "If the parcel is acquired by HUMC without the need for condemnation, the parcel shall be conveyed to the City for nominal consideration"
* CORRECTION - ONLY PART OF THE PROPERTY IS COVETED BY THE CITY, BUT WHICH PART? AGREEMENT DOES NOT SPECIFY.
Clearly, the reason for eliminating the parking is not as simple as a "safety issue". I guess it could be stretched to make that argument because all of the development by the hospital has created an unsafe residential environment. The real reason seems to be because the City entered into this agreement with HUMC and must abide by it - tenants be damned. Since the City provided no proof of any other reason, the wording of the Developer's Agreement is all I have to go on.
The fact that neither the Mayor nor City Manager (the only 2 permitted to speak according to Mayor's rules) mentioned this agreement as the reason for the ordinance makes me wonder if they even know this. If they do know it and did not state that when asked about it, well, in my opinion, that would be a lie of omission. Shame on you, Mr. Mayor & City Manager.
This is going to make it difficult for people who live there to find free parking and, as of right now, there is no provision for handicapped parking. But that seems to be the least of their problems because now the bigger question is, are the residents of 64 Prospect going to be forced out of their homes?
Saturday, November 7, 2009
Meeting Reminders
Committee of the Whole (COW) meeting Monday November 9th
Council Meeting Tuesday November 10th - check the previous (Oct 20) meeting minutes to see if there are any proposed ordinances of interest to you. Even if there aren't come and speak for your 5 minutes at the public session.
These are the only meetings this month - be there if you can
ALSO - 2nd Ward meeting @ Hillers on 11/23
Council Meeting Tuesday November 10th - check the previous (Oct 20) meeting minutes to see if there are any proposed ordinances of interest to you. Even if there aren't come and speak for your 5 minutes at the public session.
These are the only meetings this month - be there if you can
ALSO - 2nd Ward meeting @ Hillers on 11/23
Wednesday, November 4, 2009
The seeds of change have been planted
Now let's see who Christie appoints to key posts. Any idea who is being considered for Attorney General?
http://www.northjersey.com/news/governorsrace2009.html
And closer to home, Hackensack City officials should be thinking twice now that the Dem Freeholders were defeated. Congrats to John & Rob.
http://www.northjersey.com/news/governorsrace2009.html
And closer to home, Hackensack City officials should be thinking twice now that the Dem Freeholders were defeated. Congrats to John & Rob.
Tuesday, November 3, 2009
Aloia replaced in special services district
Tuesday, November 3, 2009
BY MICHAEL GARTLAND
The Record
STAFF WRITER
Embattled schools superintendent Robert Aloia will no longer serve as head of the Bergen County Special Services School District, according to Charles Grillo, president of the district’s board.
Howard Lerner, an assistant superintendent with both the county’s special services and technical districts, will replace Aloia as special services’ interim superintendent. Grillo said the special services board will vote formally to replace Aloia at its meeting Nov. 12.
“We can’t fire him, because we don’t have a contract with him,” Grillo said.
Aloia’s employment agreement is with the technical district, which has an inter-local agreement with the special services district, allowing them to share administrative costs.
One administration oversees both districts, but Aloia continues to act as the head of the technical district, which has hired an attorney to handle the termination of his employment there.
Aloia has been a subject of criticism since April for his handling of both districts’ finances, excessive travel and meal expenses and the purchase of two electron microscopes. Both school boards, the unions that represent teachers in the districts and County Executive Dennis McNerney all have called on him to resign. The state Department of Education is investigating the districts’ finances.
Aloia did not return a request for comment Tuesday.
Elyse Schifrien, co-president of the union that represents teachers in the special services district, said she did not have a problem with Lerner serving on an interim basis.
Lerner previously served as director of special services for Wayne schools. He could not be reached for comment Tuesday.
“I’m thrilled that they’ve replaced Robert with someone else,” Schifrien said.
E-mail: gartland@northjersey.com
Embattled schools superintendent Robert Aloia will no longer serve as head of the Bergen County Special Services School District, according to Charles Grillo, president of the district’s board.
Howard Lerner, an assistant superintendent with both the county’s special services and technical districts, will replace Aloia as special services’ interim superintendent. Grillo said the special services board will vote formally to replace Aloia at its meeting Nov. 12.
“We can’t fire him, because we don’t have a contract with him,” Grillo said.
Aloia’s employment agreement is with the technical district, which has an inter-local agreement with the special services district, allowing them to share administrative costs.
One administration oversees both districts, but Aloia continues to act as the head of the technical district, which has hired an attorney to handle the termination of his employment there.
Aloia has been a subject of criticism since April for his handling of both districts’ finances, excessive travel and meal expenses and the purchase of two electron microscopes. Both school boards, the unions that represent teachers in the districts and County Executive Dennis McNerney all have called on him to resign. The state Department of Education is investigating the districts’ finances.
Aloia did not return a request for comment Tuesday.
Elyse Schifrien, co-president of the union that represents teachers in the special services district, said she did not have a problem with Lerner serving on an interim basis.
Lerner previously served as director of special services for Wayne schools. He could not be reached for comment Tuesday.
“I’m thrilled that they’ve replaced Robert with someone else,” Schifrien said.
E-mail: gartland@northjersey.com
BY MICHAEL GARTLAND
The Record
STAFF WRITER
Embattled schools superintendent Robert Aloia will no longer serve as head of the Bergen County Special Services School District, according to Charles Grillo, president of the district’s board.
Howard Lerner, an assistant superintendent with both the county’s special services and technical districts, will replace Aloia as special services’ interim superintendent. Grillo said the special services board will vote formally to replace Aloia at its meeting Nov. 12.
“We can’t fire him, because we don’t have a contract with him,” Grillo said.
Aloia’s employment agreement is with the technical district, which has an inter-local agreement with the special services district, allowing them to share administrative costs.
One administration oversees both districts, but Aloia continues to act as the head of the technical district, which has hired an attorney to handle the termination of his employment there.
Aloia has been a subject of criticism since April for his handling of both districts’ finances, excessive travel and meal expenses and the purchase of two electron microscopes. Both school boards, the unions that represent teachers in the districts and County Executive Dennis McNerney all have called on him to resign. The state Department of Education is investigating the districts’ finances.
Aloia did not return a request for comment Tuesday.
Elyse Schifrien, co-president of the union that represents teachers in the special services district, said she did not have a problem with Lerner serving on an interim basis.
Lerner previously served as director of special services for Wayne schools. He could not be reached for comment Tuesday.
“I’m thrilled that they’ve replaced Robert with someone else,” Schifrien said.
E-mail: gartland@northjersey.com
Embattled schools superintendent Robert Aloia will no longer serve as head of the Bergen County Special Services School District, according to Charles Grillo, president of the district’s board.
Howard Lerner, an assistant superintendent with both the county’s special services and technical districts, will replace Aloia as special services’ interim superintendent. Grillo said the special services board will vote formally to replace Aloia at its meeting Nov. 12.
“We can’t fire him, because we don’t have a contract with him,” Grillo said.
Aloia’s employment agreement is with the technical district, which has an inter-local agreement with the special services district, allowing them to share administrative costs.
One administration oversees both districts, but Aloia continues to act as the head of the technical district, which has hired an attorney to handle the termination of his employment there.
Aloia has been a subject of criticism since April for his handling of both districts’ finances, excessive travel and meal expenses and the purchase of two electron microscopes. Both school boards, the unions that represent teachers in the districts and County Executive Dennis McNerney all have called on him to resign. The state Department of Education is investigating the districts’ finances.
Aloia did not return a request for comment Tuesday.
Elyse Schifrien, co-president of the union that represents teachers in the special services district, said she did not have a problem with Lerner serving on an interim basis.
Lerner previously served as director of special services for Wayne schools. He could not be reached for comment Tuesday.
“I’m thrilled that they’ve replaced Robert with someone else,” Schifrien said.
E-mail: gartland@northjersey.com
Monday, November 2, 2009
2nd Ward Meeting
Second Ward Neighbors Invited
The Hackensack City Council will host a town hall-style meeting of the city’s Second Ward at 7 p.m. on Monday, November 23 at the Fanny Hillers School, 56 Longview Avenue. All community concerns will be discussed and ample time will be devoted to citizens’ questions.
In addition to elected officials, the city manager as well as officials from the police, recreation and health department will be available to provide information. Representatives from the newly-established Boys and Girls Club of Lodi and Hackensack will attend. Light refreshments will be served.
For more information, contact the city manager’s office, 201-646-3900.
The Hackensack City Council will host a town hall-style meeting of the city’s Second Ward at 7 p.m. on Monday, November 23 at the Fanny Hillers School, 56 Longview Avenue. All community concerns will be discussed and ample time will be devoted to citizens’ questions.
In addition to elected officials, the city manager as well as officials from the police, recreation and health department will be available to provide information. Representatives from the newly-established Boys and Girls Club of Lodi and Hackensack will attend. Light refreshments will be served.
For more information, contact the city manager’s office, 201-646-3900.
Sunday, November 1, 2009
Saturday, October 31, 2009
Bergen County Freeholder Election
Herald News Editorial: Freeholder boards need more dissent
Saturday, October 31, 2009
Herald News
FORMER President RichardNixon made his political comeback by tapping into a new base — a group he once described as the "great silent majority," that is, a majority of Americans whose opinions were rarely heard or appreciated by the powers that be.
Over the past few years, the boards of freeholders in both Bergen and Passaic counties have formed their own great silent majorities. In fact, they are super majorities, composed entirely of Democrats, fairly elected by the people, but who because of their "great silent majority" of power, are rarely open about the way they conduct the people's business.
We believe it is time to break that code of silence. It is time for these boards to operate with more transparency. It is time to end the era of consent agendas, where a county's big decisions are conducted behind closed doors and then merely signed off on in the public arena by unanimous votes with no discussion. Taxpayers in these two counties pay some of the highest taxes in the land; at the very least they deserve county officials who are accountable and answerable for their actions.
The only way that can happen, as we see it, is for an end to one-party rule. It is time to crack open the "great silent majority" in both Bergen and Passaic counties.
In Bergen, two Republican challengers, John Driscoll and Robert Hermansen, have vowed to more closely scrutinize budgeting, and to at least slow the process of public spending. Their opponents, Democratic incumbents Julie O'Brien of Ramsey and Vernon Walton of Englewood, are part of the problem. An example is the recent travel and dining expenses of administrators in the Bergen County Technical and Special Services school districts. O'Brien and Walton sit on the vocational schools committee, which oversees the districts' spending.
In Passaic, the Republican challengers are Michael Marotta and Deborah Ciambrone of Wayne and Ed O'Connell of Wanaque. Like other taxpayers in the county, they have grown frustrated at the mismanagement of county budgeting, from the Preakness Health Care Center upgrade, which ended up costing more than twice its original $45 million budget estimate, to the loss, because of inaction, of a $1 million federal grant for renovation at Lambert Castle. Of the Democrats, only Freeholder Director Tahesha Way is an incumbent. Her running mates are Haledon Mayor Domenick Stampone and Evangeline Gomez of Hawthorne. Of the three, only Gomez shows any inclination that she would be willing to buck the status quo.
In the end though, we feel the freeholder boards in both counties need new blood, and especially, new and loud voices of dissent.
In Bergen County, The Herald News endorses Republicans John Driscoll and Robert Hermansen for freeholder. In Passaic County, The Herald News endorses Republicans Michael Marotta, Deborah Ciambrone and Ed O'Connell for freeholder.
***
In the race for Passaic County clerk, we find both candidates, Democrat Keith Kazmark and Republican Kristin Corrado, articulate and informed about an office that oversees many important functions of county government. We admire Kazmark's passion for public service and his eagerness to bring technical innovation to the office. But we feel that Corrado, given her legal experience across a wide spectrum, and in particular in regard to deeds, mortgages and wills, to be better qualified for the position.
The Herald News endorses Republican Kristin Corrado for Passaic County Clerk.
Saturday, October 31, 2009
Herald News
FORMER President RichardNixon made his political comeback by tapping into a new base — a group he once described as the "great silent majority," that is, a majority of Americans whose opinions were rarely heard or appreciated by the powers that be.
Over the past few years, the boards of freeholders in both Bergen and Passaic counties have formed their own great silent majorities. In fact, they are super majorities, composed entirely of Democrats, fairly elected by the people, but who because of their "great silent majority" of power, are rarely open about the way they conduct the people's business.
We believe it is time to break that code of silence. It is time for these boards to operate with more transparency. It is time to end the era of consent agendas, where a county's big decisions are conducted behind closed doors and then merely signed off on in the public arena by unanimous votes with no discussion. Taxpayers in these two counties pay some of the highest taxes in the land; at the very least they deserve county officials who are accountable and answerable for their actions.
The only way that can happen, as we see it, is for an end to one-party rule. It is time to crack open the "great silent majority" in both Bergen and Passaic counties.
In Bergen, two Republican challengers, John Driscoll and Robert Hermansen, have vowed to more closely scrutinize budgeting, and to at least slow the process of public spending. Their opponents, Democratic incumbents Julie O'Brien of Ramsey and Vernon Walton of Englewood, are part of the problem. An example is the recent travel and dining expenses of administrators in the Bergen County Technical and Special Services school districts. O'Brien and Walton sit on the vocational schools committee, which oversees the districts' spending.
In Passaic, the Republican challengers are Michael Marotta and Deborah Ciambrone of Wayne and Ed O'Connell of Wanaque. Like other taxpayers in the county, they have grown frustrated at the mismanagement of county budgeting, from the Preakness Health Care Center upgrade, which ended up costing more than twice its original $45 million budget estimate, to the loss, because of inaction, of a $1 million federal grant for renovation at Lambert Castle. Of the Democrats, only Freeholder Director Tahesha Way is an incumbent. Her running mates are Haledon Mayor Domenick Stampone and Evangeline Gomez of Hawthorne. Of the three, only Gomez shows any inclination that she would be willing to buck the status quo.
In the end though, we feel the freeholder boards in both counties need new blood, and especially, new and loud voices of dissent.
In Bergen County, The Herald News endorses Republicans John Driscoll and Robert Hermansen for freeholder. In Passaic County, The Herald News endorses Republicans Michael Marotta, Deborah Ciambrone and Ed O'Connell for freeholder.
***
In the race for Passaic County clerk, we find both candidates, Democrat Keith Kazmark and Republican Kristin Corrado, articulate and informed about an office that oversees many important functions of county government. We admire Kazmark's passion for public service and his eagerness to bring technical innovation to the office. But we feel that Corrado, given her legal experience across a wide spectrum, and in particular in regard to deeds, mortgages and wills, to be better qualified for the position.
The Herald News endorses Republican Kristin Corrado for Passaic County Clerk.
Saturday, October 24, 2009
October 20, 2009 Hackensack City Council
I'm not the most tech savy person, so it might be a little rough and it is out of order. But I am determined and I finally figured out how to post this. I'm still working on the process. I hope I didn't leave any parts out. I apoligize that it's out of order, but at least it's here.
Here is video of the 10/20 council meeting. There is an interesting part is at the end, so be sure to watch that one.
2nd section (first is below)
1st part below (the mic stopped working)
start of the meeting
1st part of above (should be after Brennan)
Here is video of the 10/20 council meeting. There is an interesting part is at the end, so be sure to watch that one.
2nd section (first is below)
3rd part
4th part
Bill Brennan addresses the council
Last video - watch the end of this - after Councilman Labrosse speaks @ 14:50 the Mayor makes an inappropriate comment - unbelievable!
1st part below (the mic stopped working)
start of the meeting
1st part of above (should be after Brennan)
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
Remember School House Rock? How a bill becomes a law?
NJSA 40:49-2 Procedure for passage; "governing body" defined
Except as otherwise provided in R.S.40:49-6 and 40:49-12, the procedure for the passage of ordinances shall be as follows:
a. Every ordinance after being introduced and having passed a first reading, which first reading may be by title, shall be published in its entirety or by title or by title and summary at least once in a newspaper published and circulated in the municipality, if there be one, and if not, in a newspaper printed in the county and circulating in the municipality, together with a notice of the introduction thereof, the time and place when and where it will be further considered for final passage, a clear and concise statement prepared by the clerk of the governing body setting forth the purpose of the ordinance, and the time and place when and where a copy of the ordinance can be obtained without cost by any member of the general public who wants a copy of the ordinance. If there be only one such publication the same shall be at least one week prior to the time fixed for further consideration for final passage. If there be more than one publication, the first shall be at least one week prior to the time fixed for further consideration for final passage.
b. At the time and place so stated in such publication, or at any time and place to which the meeting for the further consideration of the ordinance shall from time to time be adjourned, all persons interested shall be given an opportunity to be heard concerning the ordinance. The opportunity to be heard shall include the right to ask pertinent questions concerning the ordinance by any resident of the municipality or any other person affected by the ordinance. Final passage thereof shall be at least 10 days after the first reading.
c. Upon the opening of the hearing, the ordinance shall be given a second reading, which reading may be by title, and thereafter, it may be passed with or without amendments, or rejected. Prior to the said second reading, a copy of the ordinance shall be posted on the bulletin board or other place upon which public notices are customarily posted in the principal municipal building of the municipality, and copies of the ordinance shall be made available to members of the general public of the municipality who shall request such copies. If any amendment be adopted, substantially altering the substance of the ordinance, the ordinance as so amended shall not be finally adopted until at least one week thereafter, and the ordinance as amended shall be read at a meeting of the governing body, which reading may be by title, and shall be published in its entirety or by title or by title and summary, together with a notice of the introduction, the time and place when and where a copy of the amended ordinance can be obtained without any cost by any member of the general public who desires a copy, a clear and concise statement prepared by the clerk of the governing body setting forth the purpose of the ordinance, and the time and place when and where the amended ordinance will be further considered for final passage, at least two days prior to the time so fixed. At the time and place so fixed, or at any other meeting to which the further consideration of the amended ordinance may be adjourned, the governing body may proceed to pass the ordinance, as amended, or again amend it in the same manner.
d. Upon passage, every ordinance, or the title, or the title and a summary, together with a notice of the date of passage or approval, or both, shall be published at least once in a newspaper circulating in the municipality, if there be one, and if not, in a newspaper printed in the county and circulating in the municipality. No other notice or procedure with respect to the introduction or passage of any ordinance shall be required.
Nothing herein shall be construed to affect the provisions of R.S.40:49-7 to 40:49-12 or R.S.40:49-27.
For the purposes of this section, "governing body" shall include any municipal or county agency, board or commission authorized by law to adopt ordinances.
Except as otherwise provided in R.S.40:49-6 and 40:49-12, the procedure for the passage of ordinances shall be as follows:
a. Every ordinance after being introduced and having passed a first reading, which first reading may be by title, shall be published in its entirety or by title or by title and summary at least once in a newspaper published and circulated in the municipality, if there be one, and if not, in a newspaper printed in the county and circulating in the municipality, together with a notice of the introduction thereof, the time and place when and where it will be further considered for final passage, a clear and concise statement prepared by the clerk of the governing body setting forth the purpose of the ordinance, and the time and place when and where a copy of the ordinance can be obtained without cost by any member of the general public who wants a copy of the ordinance. If there be only one such publication the same shall be at least one week prior to the time fixed for further consideration for final passage. If there be more than one publication, the first shall be at least one week prior to the time fixed for further consideration for final passage.
b. At the time and place so stated in such publication, or at any time and place to which the meeting for the further consideration of the ordinance shall from time to time be adjourned, all persons interested shall be given an opportunity to be heard concerning the ordinance. The opportunity to be heard shall include the right to ask pertinent questions concerning the ordinance by any resident of the municipality or any other person affected by the ordinance. Final passage thereof shall be at least 10 days after the first reading.
c. Upon the opening of the hearing, the ordinance shall be given a second reading, which reading may be by title, and thereafter, it may be passed with or without amendments, or rejected. Prior to the said second reading, a copy of the ordinance shall be posted on the bulletin board or other place upon which public notices are customarily posted in the principal municipal building of the municipality, and copies of the ordinance shall be made available to members of the general public of the municipality who shall request such copies. If any amendment be adopted, substantially altering the substance of the ordinance, the ordinance as so amended shall not be finally adopted until at least one week thereafter, and the ordinance as amended shall be read at a meeting of the governing body, which reading may be by title, and shall be published in its entirety or by title or by title and summary, together with a notice of the introduction, the time and place when and where a copy of the amended ordinance can be obtained without any cost by any member of the general public who desires a copy, a clear and concise statement prepared by the clerk of the governing body setting forth the purpose of the ordinance, and the time and place when and where the amended ordinance will be further considered for final passage, at least two days prior to the time so fixed. At the time and place so fixed, or at any other meeting to which the further consideration of the amended ordinance may be adjourned, the governing body may proceed to pass the ordinance, as amended, or again amend it in the same manner.
d. Upon passage, every ordinance, or the title, or the title and a summary, together with a notice of the date of passage or approval, or both, shall be published at least once in a newspaper circulating in the municipality, if there be one, and if not, in a newspaper printed in the county and circulating in the municipality. No other notice or procedure with respect to the introduction or passage of any ordinance shall be required.
Nothing herein shall be construed to affect the provisions of R.S.40:49-7 to 40:49-12 or R.S.40:49-27.
For the purposes of this section, "governing body" shall include any municipal or county agency, board or commission authorized by law to adopt ordinances.
Tuesday, October 20, 2009
October 20 Council Meeting
I'm waiting to get the video of the meeting, but in the meantime
Meeting is continued to Thursday 11/22 to possibly award bids (if any are acceptable) for Anderson Street sewers - time and place not announced - was this advertised?
There is going to be a 2nd Ward town hall meeting - tentatively scheduled for 11/23 @ Hillers
Kennedy is going to be repaved with grant money
H1N1 vaccination preparations under way
Improvements were noted by City Manager in 1st Ward
Soccer field lights should be complete by middle of next week - but no idea when power will be supplied
No parking Ordinance passed on Frederick St from Hudson to Jackson
First reading of the following - public comment @ 11/10 meeting:
Bond Ordinance $488,996 for improvements to various roads and curbs
Ordinance No Parking from Essex to Atlantic on Prospect
Ordinance amending property maintenance code to require permit and inspection process for storage containers
Payment of bills totalling about $2,340,000
Hire Gittleman, Muhlstock and Chewcaskie as Special Litigation Attorney
"Kitchen Sink" Resolutions (all voted on at once with no public input)
Award Bid to D&L Paving $103,722.35 for improvements to Arcadia Road (don't know why typed Resolution says "Plumbing")
Various Community Development Grants are being used by other agencies within the City
Club License (liquor) for St Paul's Lodge ceases to exist due to non-renewal
Tax refunds in the total amount of $55,495.78 were authorized
Refund in the amount of $250
Agreement with Board of Ed for H1N1 vaccination funding
136 Essex Street tax assessment reduced from $755,600 to $500,000
15 Warren Street tax assessment reduced from $3,925,600 to $3,462,000
275 Central Ave tax assessment reduced from $1,718,200 to $1,266,000
170 Central Ave tax assessment reduced from $1,880,600 to $1,420,000
30 Euclid Ave tax assessment reduced from $3,983,400 for 2007 & 2008 to 3,500,000 for 2007 and $3,350,000 for 2008
Toni Miello appointed to Recreation Board
Quantum Clean Energy Solutions authorized to examine various areas in order to recommend a strategy for stimulus grant funds for energy savings
Liquor License person to person transfer from Donn Pomodoro to Donn Pomodoro II
Raffle approved Parent Partnership Organization
Public Comments were varied - I hope to get the video of these
Budget issues - we're in good shape. Still to be answered what the "cap" is for self-insurance with regard to lawsuits
Still no comment from our officials regarding the state of the Police Department but citizens keep expressing their concerns
Bill Brennan addressed the Mayor & Council regarding the police department lawsuit situation (speaking from first hand experience) - as an aside the city attorney did stray from the standard "can't comment, it's in litigation" mode and referred to a motion being dismissed in federal court (RICO count I believe)
The Cultural Arts Center is not a good neighbor - the director will be spoken to
The City is going to look into the issue of handicapped parking along Prospect between Atlantic and Essex, where no parking has been proposed
There seems to be some question as to whether the council is in violation of Open Public Meeting Act (OPMA) because there is no discussion at the public meeting where an issue is advertised
And the Mayor could not help himself, he had to get in a rude remark at the end, relating to the OPMA issue. Councilman Labrosse agreed that the discussions should take place at the council meeting. The mayor stated that he would not respond to that because it didn't deserve a response. Not sure if he was talking about the councilman's remark or the citizen's - either way it was outright rude!
Meeting is continued to Thursday 11/22 to possibly award bids (if any are acceptable) for Anderson Street sewers - time and place not announced - was this advertised?
There is going to be a 2nd Ward town hall meeting - tentatively scheduled for 11/23 @ Hillers
Kennedy is going to be repaved with grant money
H1N1 vaccination preparations under way
Improvements were noted by City Manager in 1st Ward
Soccer field lights should be complete by middle of next week - but no idea when power will be supplied
No parking Ordinance passed on Frederick St from Hudson to Jackson
First reading of the following - public comment @ 11/10 meeting:
Bond Ordinance $488,996 for improvements to various roads and curbs
Ordinance No Parking from Essex to Atlantic on Prospect
Ordinance amending property maintenance code to require permit and inspection process for storage containers
Payment of bills totalling about $2,340,000
Hire Gittleman, Muhlstock and Chewcaskie as Special Litigation Attorney
"Kitchen Sink" Resolutions (all voted on at once with no public input)
Award Bid to D&L Paving $103,722.35 for improvements to Arcadia Road (don't know why typed Resolution says "Plumbing")
Various Community Development Grants are being used by other agencies within the City
Club License (liquor) for St Paul's Lodge ceases to exist due to non-renewal
Tax refunds in the total amount of $55,495.78 were authorized
Refund in the amount of $250
Agreement with Board of Ed for H1N1 vaccination funding
136 Essex Street tax assessment reduced from $755,600 to $500,000
15 Warren Street tax assessment reduced from $3,925,600 to $3,462,000
275 Central Ave tax assessment reduced from $1,718,200 to $1,266,000
170 Central Ave tax assessment reduced from $1,880,600 to $1,420,000
30 Euclid Ave tax assessment reduced from $3,983,400 for 2007 & 2008 to 3,500,000 for 2007 and $3,350,000 for 2008
Toni Miello appointed to Recreation Board
Quantum Clean Energy Solutions authorized to examine various areas in order to recommend a strategy for stimulus grant funds for energy savings
Liquor License person to person transfer from Donn Pomodoro to Donn Pomodoro II
Raffle approved Parent Partnership Organization
Public Comments were varied - I hope to get the video of these
Budget issues - we're in good shape. Still to be answered what the "cap" is for self-insurance with regard to lawsuits
Still no comment from our officials regarding the state of the Police Department but citizens keep expressing their concerns
Bill Brennan addressed the Mayor & Council regarding the police department lawsuit situation (speaking from first hand experience) - as an aside the city attorney did stray from the standard "can't comment, it's in litigation" mode and referred to a motion being dismissed in federal court (RICO count I believe)
The Cultural Arts Center is not a good neighbor - the director will be spoken to
The City is going to look into the issue of handicapped parking along Prospect between Atlantic and Essex, where no parking has been proposed
There seems to be some question as to whether the council is in violation of Open Public Meeting Act (OPMA) because there is no discussion at the public meeting where an issue is advertised
And the Mayor could not help himself, he had to get in a rude remark at the end, relating to the OPMA issue. Councilman Labrosse agreed that the discussions should take place at the council meeting. The mayor stated that he would not respond to that because it didn't deserve a response. Not sure if he was talking about the councilman's remark or the citizen's - either way it was outright rude!
Friday, October 16, 2009
10/16 Chronicle Article
http://www.northjersey.com/news/64468817.html
We now will have twice as many H-COPs as police officers and yet a uniformed officer gets assigned to taking signs off of poles. Go figure.
We now will have twice as many H-COPs as police officers and yet a uniformed officer gets assigned to taking signs off of poles. Go figure.
Monday, October 12, 2009
Is it an "inquiry" or an "investigation"?
http://www.northjersey.com/news/crime_courts/Bergen_County_prosecutor_begins_inquiry_of_Hackensack_investigation.html
LoIacono is quoted - He stressed that the prosecutor’s office is “absolutely not” conducting an investigation and “There is no investigation, but whatever they are doing, has nothing to do with the postponement,” he said.
And later ... according to this article - In a letter to attorney’s for both sides, dated Oct. 9, LoIacono informs them of the adjournment, and also states that he will communicate with the prosecutor’s office on an ongoing basis in order to “ascertain the scope of its investigation and the impact, if any, on the pending proceedings.”
What's the difference between an inquiry and an investigation? Apparently there is some difference to Mr. LoIacono, but there appears to be no difference according to the dictionary
in·quir·y
play_w2("I0157500")
(n-kwr, nkwr, nkw-r, ng-) also en·quir·y (n-kwr, nkw-r)
n. pl. in·quir·ies also en·quir·ies
1. The act of inquiring.
2. A question; a query.
3. A close examination of a matter in a search for information or truth.
Synonyms: inquiry, inquest, inquisition, investigation, probe, research
SECOND ARTICLE ON THIS SUBJECT
http://www.northjersey.com/news/Disciplinary_hearing_for_Hackensack_cop_postponed.html
LoIacono is quoted - He stressed that the prosecutor’s office is “absolutely not” conducting an investigation and “There is no investigation, but whatever they are doing, has nothing to do with the postponement,” he said.
And later ... according to this article - In a letter to attorney’s for both sides, dated Oct. 9, LoIacono informs them of the adjournment, and also states that he will communicate with the prosecutor’s office on an ongoing basis in order to “ascertain the scope of its investigation and the impact, if any, on the pending proceedings.”
What's the difference between an inquiry and an investigation? Apparently there is some difference to Mr. LoIacono, but there appears to be no difference according to the dictionary
in·quir·y
play_w2("I0157500")
(n-kwr, nkwr, nkw-r, ng-) also en·quir·y (n-kwr, nkw-r)
n. pl. in·quir·ies also en·quir·ies
1. The act of inquiring.
2. A question; a query.
3. A close examination of a matter in a search for information or truth.
Synonyms: inquiry, inquest, inquisition, investigation, probe, research
SECOND ARTICLE ON THIS SUBJECT
http://www.northjersey.com/news/Disciplinary_hearing_for_Hackensack_cop_postponed.html
Sunday, October 11, 2009
Main & Anderson
I saw on hackensacknow that someone is questioning what is taking so long with the repair of Main & Anderson sewer and why the public isn't being kept informed about the situation. The editor of hackensacknow never really answered the question except to say that it's been posted that the street is closed - newspaper, internet, hand-delivered fliers, television, public meetings.
What was said about the situation at public meetings is that the company that was doing a really good job has the contract for "emergency" sewer repairs only. It seems the price they quoted to do the final repair was too high according to the City. So, the City is taking bids for this job from others. So far the City doesn't seem to have come across a price they like. So, it remains closed.
What was said about the situation at public meetings is that the company that was doing a really good job has the contract for "emergency" sewer repairs only. It seems the price they quoted to do the final repair was too high according to the City. So, the City is taking bids for this job from others. So far the City doesn't seem to have come across a price they like. So, it remains closed.
Tuesday, October 6, 2009
Audio Only 10/6 Council Meeting
Memorable quotes from 10/6 meeting
Mayor said - as if how dare a council member ask a question
"When have we ever not responded to them?"
"If they come, have we ever not responded?"
"You are putting something on record that is a given from this council. So I don't understand why you're doing that because this council responds to everybody that comes to it."
"To come out like that, it's like we would not respond."
(Items 1 thru 5 are not on the audio - sorry)
1. OPMA
2. Roll Call
3. Flag Salute
4. Approval of Minutes Sept 14 & Sept 15
5. City Manager's Report
6. 0:00 Resolution 336-09 Appoint up to 220 Special Law Enforcement Officers (H-COPS)
APPROVED
7. 6:15 Resolution 337-09 $630,000 for sewer repairs of which $598,500 is bonds or notes
APPROVED
8. 11:50 Resolution 338-09 $433,300 for 2nd Ward (Hillers) Park play gym and spray fountain of which $214,435 is bonds or notes - total includes County Grant of $208,065 & $10,800 down payment
APPROVED
9. 14:45 Resolution 339-09 Change Elm Avenue to one way heading east (towards Main) between Grand and Pine
APPROVED
10. 28:55 Resolution 340-09 Building Department Fee Schedule
APPROVED
11. 32:25 Resolution 341-09 Trucks over 4 tons excluded on Railroad between Passaic and Anderson (had been a paper street)
APPROVED
12. 35:01 Resolution 342-09 One hour parking Hudson between Kansas and E Lafayette
APPROVED
13. 35:45 Resolution 343-09 1/2 hour parking Linden from Anderson to Maple
APPROVED
14. 36:25 Resolution 344-09 Lease 120 parking spaces from HUMC for 99 years @ $1/year
APPROVED
15. 40:10 Resolution 345-09 No Parking Frederick from Hudson to Jackson
APPROVED
16. 41:15 Resolution 346-09 Payment of bills totalling $9,043,538.71
APPROVED
42:20 The following are Consent Agenda items that are not discussed or open for public comment because they are routine (hiring attorneys and sewer emergencies have become all too routine) Consent Agenda items will be reflected in full in the minutes including any exceptions and/or additions.
17. Resolution #347-09 Purchase of 2010 Ford Crown Victoria $26,233.00 paid from Public Parking System funds
18. Resolution #348-09 Recreation Dept. Refund
19. Resolution #349-09 Tax Refunds to various property owners. $9292.19 in duplicate payments & $55,902.88 reductions
20. Resolution #350-09 Health Department Grant H1N1 (swine flu) application authorized
21. Resolution #351-09 SCADA Maintenance (supervisory control and data acquisition) to Red Oak Consulting $35,000
22. Resolution #352-09 Tax Appeal Settlement 22-32 Camden reduced from $1,255,300 to $850,000 for 2007 & 2008 and $800,000 for 2009
23. Resolution #353-09 Tax Appeal Settlement 609 Summit Ave, Block 604 Lot 10.01 from $2,247,300 to $1,560,000 for 2007 & 2008 and Lot 14.03 from $571,200 to $400,000 for each year under appeal (note - the written agenda seems to have errors - but I believe above is what it should read)
24. Resolution #354-09 BC Community Development Committee Appointments - Joe Mellone thru 9/1/2010
25. Resolution #355.09 Appointment to Open Space Committee - Steve LoIacono thru 6/30/2010
Mayor said - as if how dare a council member ask a question
"When have we ever not responded to them?"
"If they come, have we ever not responded?"
"You are putting something on record that is a given from this council. So I don't understand why you're doing that because this council responds to everybody that comes to it."
"To come out like that, it's like we would not respond."
Apparently the Mayor not only doesn't like questions from citizens; he also does not like when a council member asks a question. Listen to the way he speaks to Councilman Labrosse regarding the question he asked about the Resolution for Elm @ about 27:22 min. "Have we ever not responded?"
And it seems that the Mayor & Council accept no responsibility for the Police Department. If they did, there'd be some sort of comment - either for or against. And the public was told there would be no response to questions about the police department (see above).
PLEASE NOTE - THESE ARE NOT "OFFICIAL" MEETING MINUTES. This is the agenda from the council meeting.
I have updated this to include the Agenda and indicate the time on the audio where each item is located(Items 1 thru 5 are not on the audio - sorry)
1. OPMA
2. Roll Call
3. Flag Salute
4. Approval of Minutes Sept 14 & Sept 15
5. City Manager's Report
6. 0:00 Resolution 336-09 Appoint up to 220 Special Law Enforcement Officers (H-COPS)
APPROVED
7. 6:15 Resolution 337-09 $630,000 for sewer repairs of which $598,500 is bonds or notes
APPROVED
8. 11:50 Resolution 338-09 $433,300 for 2nd Ward (Hillers) Park play gym and spray fountain of which $214,435 is bonds or notes - total includes County Grant of $208,065 & $10,800 down payment
APPROVED
9. 14:45 Resolution 339-09 Change Elm Avenue to one way heading east (towards Main) between Grand and Pine
APPROVED
10. 28:55 Resolution 340-09 Building Department Fee Schedule
APPROVED
11. 32:25 Resolution 341-09 Trucks over 4 tons excluded on Railroad between Passaic and Anderson (had been a paper street)
APPROVED
12. 35:01 Resolution 342-09 One hour parking Hudson between Kansas and E Lafayette
APPROVED
13. 35:45 Resolution 343-09 1/2 hour parking Linden from Anderson to Maple
APPROVED
14. 36:25 Resolution 344-09 Lease 120 parking spaces from HUMC for 99 years @ $1/year
APPROVED
15. 40:10 Resolution 345-09 No Parking Frederick from Hudson to Jackson
APPROVED
16. 41:15 Resolution 346-09 Payment of bills totalling $9,043,538.71
APPROVED
42:20 The following are Consent Agenda items that are not discussed or open for public comment because they are routine (hiring attorneys and sewer emergencies have become all too routine) Consent Agenda items will be reflected in full in the minutes including any exceptions and/or additions.
17. Resolution #347-09 Purchase of 2010 Ford Crown Victoria $26,233.00 paid from Public Parking System funds
18. Resolution #348-09 Recreation Dept. Refund
19. Resolution #349-09 Tax Refunds to various property owners. $9292.19 in duplicate payments & $55,902.88 reductions
20. Resolution #350-09 Health Department Grant H1N1 (swine flu) application authorized
21. Resolution #351-09 SCADA Maintenance (supervisory control and data acquisition) to Red Oak Consulting $35,000
22. Resolution #352-09 Tax Appeal Settlement 22-32 Camden reduced from $1,255,300 to $850,000 for 2007 & 2008 and $800,000 for 2009
23. Resolution #353-09 Tax Appeal Settlement 609 Summit Ave, Block 604 Lot 10.01 from $2,247,300 to $1,560,000 for 2007 & 2008 and Lot 14.03 from $571,200 to $400,000 for each year under appeal (note - the written agenda seems to have errors - but I believe above is what it should read)
24. Resolution #354-09 BC Community Development Committee Appointments - Joe Mellone thru 9/1/2010
25. Resolution #355.09 Appointment to Open Space Committee - Steve LoIacono thru 6/30/2010
26. Resolution #356-09 Approval of Raffle Applications
27. Resolution #357-09 HAPADA Grant for Homework & Support Center(s), Karate at-risk 5/6 students, Boys & Girls Club SMART Moves Program, Latino Initiatives, an Underage Drinking townhall Meeting and Tobacco Age of Sale efforts
28. Resolution #358-09 Way Finding Signage Project agreement between Hackensack Way Finding Signage Project, UMA, Bergen County & HUMC
29. Resolution #359-09 Emergency Sewer Repairs— Vreeland Washington & Main
30. Resolution #360-09 Appointment of Special Attorney Raymond Wiss, Esq
31. Resolution #361-09 On-site Elevator Inspection awarded to EIC Inspection Agency Corp
Sorry about the beginning of the audio. Recorder wasn't turned on until after meeting had already started. It's an hour and sixteen minutes long. One council members mic didn't seem to be working at the beginning of the meeting, so his comments are not clear. Two other council members had no comments at all, that's why you mostly hear only the Mayor and City Manager. The last 30 minutes or so are public comments.
Thursday, October 1, 2009
from NJLM
Get to Know the Candidates and Issues with the NJN Debate Tonight
In a little more than a month, the nation's focus will be on New Jersey because it is one of only two states (Virginia is the other) holding a gubernatorial election. Also, all 80 members of the New Jersey General Assembly are up for election in 2009.
Debate Tonight on NJN Familiarize Yourself with Candidate Positions
In order to familiarize yourself with the position's of all three candidates for governor, we encourage you to watch the first gubernatorial debate, which will be broadcast on NJN tonight from 8 p.m. to 9:30 p.m. The debate, which will take place in the NJN studios in Trenton, will be simulcast on NJN Public Radio and will be streamed live and archived online. It will also be rebroadcast on NJN on October 4th at noon and 6 p.m. Click here for more information on the debate.It is very important for the citizens of our state to be engaged in and informed of the issues being discussed and, most importantly, to vote on November 3rd. A democracy only functions properly when citizens vote.Voter Education ToolsPrior to the debate, please visit the League’s website for a special report we prepared of the candidates views on timely municipal issues. We have also provided a link to the State Chamber’s web page, Election 2009, which will provide you with additional resources to become a more informed voter. Review the wealth of information assembled and share it with others so that they, too, are encouraged to exercise their civic responsibility on election day.It is extremely important that you and your governing body are familiar with the issues which impact our communities and we urge you to avail yourself of these resources. I would also suggest that you link this information to your municipality’s website so your citizenry can be informed on our issues.
Please note we have also created a new web page focused on the 2009 Election. Please check it frequently for new postings and information.
In a little more than a month, the nation's focus will be on New Jersey because it is one of only two states (Virginia is the other) holding a gubernatorial election. Also, all 80 members of the New Jersey General Assembly are up for election in 2009.
Debate Tonight on NJN Familiarize Yourself with Candidate Positions
In order to familiarize yourself with the position's of all three candidates for governor, we encourage you to watch the first gubernatorial debate, which will be broadcast on NJN tonight from 8 p.m. to 9:30 p.m. The debate, which will take place in the NJN studios in Trenton, will be simulcast on NJN Public Radio and will be streamed live and archived online. It will also be rebroadcast on NJN on October 4th at noon and 6 p.m. Click here for more information on the debate.It is very important for the citizens of our state to be engaged in and informed of the issues being discussed and, most importantly, to vote on November 3rd. A democracy only functions properly when citizens vote.Voter Education ToolsPrior to the debate, please visit the League’s website for a special report we prepared of the candidates views on timely municipal issues. We have also provided a link to the State Chamber’s web page, Election 2009, which will provide you with additional resources to become a more informed voter. Review the wealth of information assembled and share it with others so that they, too, are encouraged to exercise their civic responsibility on election day.It is extremely important that you and your governing body are familiar with the issues which impact our communities and we urge you to avail yourself of these resources. I would also suggest that you link this information to your municipality’s website so your citizenry can be informed on our issues.
Please note we have also created a new web page focused on the 2009 Election. Please check it frequently for new postings and information.
Tuesday, September 29, 2009
Oury pleads guilty
Where does that leave Joe? His co-defendant just flipped on him. Is he going to go through with the farce of a trial or is he going to make a deal?
http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2009/09/former_attorney_for_bergen_cou.html
http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2009/09/former_attorney_for_bergen_cou.html
Monday, September 28, 2009
Hackensack Medical Center
is laying off employees but can absorb the cost of Hackensack ambulance service. Don't you want to know what the City had to give up to get them agree to increase the dollar amount for our "free" ambulance service?
http://www.northjersey.com/news/health/hospitals/61640667.html
http://www.northjersey.com/news/health/hospitals/61640667.html
Friday, September 25, 2009
There aren't enough police for 1st Ward
http://www.northjersey.com/news/crime_courts/crime_courts_news/61411967.html
http://www.northjersey.com/news/crime_courts/crime_courts_news/61411927.html
because they are all in court fighting amongst themselves. Besides these cases, there are administrative hearings and civil (federal & superior) cases. Responsibility goes up the chain. Someone has to be held accountable for all of this discord and the expense.
Enough is Enough! The citizens of Hackensack deserve better. Maybe we should have a group march in the Columbus Day parade or get a booth at the street festival to let the public know what is going on and that we are fed up. This is ridiculous!
http://www.northjersey.com/news/crime_courts/crime_courts_news/61411927.html
because they are all in court fighting amongst themselves. Besides these cases, there are administrative hearings and civil (federal & superior) cases. Responsibility goes up the chain. Someone has to be held accountable for all of this discord and the expense.
Enough is Enough! The citizens of Hackensack deserve better. Maybe we should have a group march in the Columbus Day parade or get a booth at the street festival to let the public know what is going on and that we are fed up. This is ridiculous!
Tuesday, September 22, 2009
Johnson Park Research
Does anybody have the following information?
1. Are any descendants of the Johnson Family still in Hackensack or nearby?
2. Where can the Superior Court decision (not Appellate) regarding the use of the park be found?
Just leave a comment with any information you may have.
Thanks.
1. Are any descendants of the Johnson Family still in Hackensack or nearby?
2. Where can the Superior Court decision (not Appellate) regarding the use of the park be found?
Just leave a comment with any information you may have.
Thanks.
Monday, September 21, 2009
NJ Office of State Comptroller
If you are aware of waste or mismanagement at any level of New Jersey government, they want to hear from you.
HOTLINE
1-866-547-1121
HOTLINE
1-866-547-1121
Saturday, September 19, 2009
Administrative Hearing
http://www.northjersey.com/news/59810092.html
People who were there say it was an eye-opener to many who had no idea how disfunctional the police department is and at times it was entertaining.
People who were there say it was an eye-opener to many who had no idea how disfunctional the police department is and at times it was entertaining.
Friday, September 18, 2009
HPD in court
Sgt Trezza is accused of harassment for threatening another officer.
http://www.northjersey.com/news/crime_courts/59696057.html
Officer Viola is found not guilty of driving charges
http://www.northjersey.com/news/crime_courts/59695862.html
http://www.northjersey.com/news/crime_courts/59696057.html
Officer Viola is found not guilty of driving charges
http://www.northjersey.com/news/crime_courts/59695862.html
Wednesday, September 16, 2009
Again HPD in the news?
It would be nice to see some GOOD news about our police department once in a while instead of as part of some lawsuit or potential "scandal".
"Aloia attributed another receipt for $210 to a meeting with the Hackensack Police Department." What kind of meeting would require a bill of $210? With who? Where?
http://www.northjersey.com/news/education/Records_Bergen_Tech_super_reimbursed_for_15000_in_expenses.html
"Aloia attributed another receipt for $210 to a meeting with the Hackensack Police Department." What kind of meeting would require a bill of $210? With who? Where?
http://www.northjersey.com/news/education/Records_Bergen_Tech_super_reimbursed_for_15000_in_expenses.html
Tuesday, September 15, 2009
9/15/09 Council Meeting
Nice swearing in ceremony for firefighters. It gave a rare feeling of pride at a council meeting.
Recognition was also given to the doctor who gave CPR to man who was electrocuted and to Census 2010 workers.
Actual business was pretty mundane - but long
City Manager's Report
Anderson Street - will remain closed for 3-4 more weeks. Emergency bids were too high, so work is going through regular bid process, on an accelerated schedule. It seemed that Montana was doing a good job there. We'll see who gets the contract.
First Ward Town Hall Meeting - scheduled for September 23 @ 7pm - M&M Building. City departments will be there to discuss area issues. It will be posted on City website. (same night as next zoning meeting for LTACH??)
http://www.hackensack.org/controls/eventview.aspx?MODE=SINGLE&ID=465
Reorganization of Staff - there has been some moving around in City Hall. The City Clerk is now on the 3rd floor. An employee has been reassigned to answer phones, be receptionist and assist City Manager.
Final Adoption of Ordinances 22-2009 thru 25-2009
Three are parking - Hudson, Meadow, Clinton & Maple
Fourth is Contractual Salary Ordinance
To be voted on and open for public discussion on 10/6 for the following
26-2009 increase number of H-COPS to 220
27-2009 Bond Ordinance for storm & sanitary sewer repairs $598,500 bonds or notes
28-2009 Bond Ordinance for play gym and spray fountain 2nd Ward (Hillers) Park $214,435
29-2009 Elm change to one way street from Pine to Grand
30-2009 Building Dept Fee Schedule
31-2009 No trucks over 4 tons Railroad between Passaic & Anderson (didn't know Railroad ran past Passaic)
32-2009 One hour parking on Hudson from Kansas to E Lafayette (both sides)
33-2009 30 min parking on Linden East side from Anderson to Maple
34-2009 lease 120 parking spaces from HUMC for $1/year for 99 years
The only other items of interest were "First Amendment to Memorandum of Agreement" with HUMC to be signed (renegotiation of cap?) and Cafe Arabica was permitted to re-open under certain terms and conditions as specified in a written agreement.
There were very few public comments and most questions were answered after the citizen had spoken. Basically the public was told that the salary increases were about 3%, City does not pay for gas, food or parking for attendance at League of Municipalities, details of Cafe Arabica "agreement" could not be discussed because there might be litigation, Johnson Park use under Green Acres is still being looked into, parking meters near unemployment office charge .25 for 1/2 hour while on Main you get a full hour (City Manager was asked to look into this by Mayor) and that a citizen had a complaint about the postings on nj.com - especially those of one particular party.
Finally, Councilman Labrosse asked that the Mayor reconsider his new rules for public comment. Thank you Mr. Labrosse.
Recognition was also given to the doctor who gave CPR to man who was electrocuted and to Census 2010 workers.
Actual business was pretty mundane - but long
City Manager's Report
Anderson Street - will remain closed for 3-4 more weeks. Emergency bids were too high, so work is going through regular bid process, on an accelerated schedule. It seemed that Montana was doing a good job there. We'll see who gets the contract.
First Ward Town Hall Meeting - scheduled for September 23 @ 7pm - M&M Building. City departments will be there to discuss area issues. It will be posted on City website. (same night as next zoning meeting for LTACH??)
http://www.hackensack.org/controls/eventview.aspx?MODE=SINGLE&ID=465
Reorganization of Staff - there has been some moving around in City Hall. The City Clerk is now on the 3rd floor. An employee has been reassigned to answer phones, be receptionist and assist City Manager.
Final Adoption of Ordinances 22-2009 thru 25-2009
Three are parking - Hudson, Meadow, Clinton & Maple
Fourth is Contractual Salary Ordinance
To be voted on and open for public discussion on 10/6 for the following
26-2009 increase number of H-COPS to 220
27-2009 Bond Ordinance for storm & sanitary sewer repairs $598,500 bonds or notes
28-2009 Bond Ordinance for play gym and spray fountain 2nd Ward (Hillers) Park $214,435
29-2009 Elm change to one way street from Pine to Grand
30-2009 Building Dept Fee Schedule
31-2009 No trucks over 4 tons Railroad between Passaic & Anderson (didn't know Railroad ran past Passaic)
32-2009 One hour parking on Hudson from Kansas to E Lafayette (both sides)
33-2009 30 min parking on Linden East side from Anderson to Maple
34-2009 lease 120 parking spaces from HUMC for $1/year for 99 years
The only other items of interest were "First Amendment to Memorandum of Agreement" with HUMC to be signed (renegotiation of cap?) and Cafe Arabica was permitted to re-open under certain terms and conditions as specified in a written agreement.
There were very few public comments and most questions were answered after the citizen had spoken. Basically the public was told that the salary increases were about 3%, City does not pay for gas, food or parking for attendance at League of Municipalities, details of Cafe Arabica "agreement" could not be discussed because there might be litigation, Johnson Park use under Green Acres is still being looked into, parking meters near unemployment office charge .25 for 1/2 hour while on Main you get a full hour (City Manager was asked to look into this by Mayor) and that a citizen had a complaint about the postings on nj.com - especially those of one particular party.
Finally, Councilman Labrosse asked that the Mayor reconsider his new rules for public comment. Thank you Mr. Labrosse.
Monday, September 14, 2009
Council Meetings
Try to get out and be heard - even if they won't answer
Tonight is Committee of the Whole
Tomorrow is Council Meeting @ 7:00
October Schedule
5th - COW
6th - Council
19th - COW
20th - Council
Tonight is Committee of the Whole
Tomorrow is Council Meeting @ 7:00
October Schedule
5th - COW
6th - Council
19th - COW
20th - Council
Saturday, September 12, 2009
more interesting stuff
Ordinance 9-5
At the meeting of the City Council at which the City Manager makes his report as aforesaid, the employee mentioned in such report may, within the discretion of the Council, be heard; provided, however, that said employee has filed with the City Clerk at least two days prior to such Council meeting a written request setting forth the reasons for such hearing. If such a hearing is allowed to any such employee, then the City Council may permit the taking of additional proof which was not available at the time of the trial or was offered and refused by the City Manager, if in the opinion of the City Council such proof is of sufficient importance.
At the meeting of the City Council at which the City Manager makes his report as aforesaid, the employee mentioned in such report may, within the discretion of the Council, be heard; provided, however, that said employee has filed with the City Clerk at least two days prior to such Council meeting a written request setting forth the reasons for such hearing. If such a hearing is allowed to any such employee, then the City Council may permit the taking of additional proof which was not available at the time of the trial or was offered and refused by the City Manager, if in the opinion of the City Council such proof is of sufficient importance.
City Manager
Is there any truth to the rumor that he was asked to resign? Is he leaving? Only the Mayor & Council have to the power to fire him. But someone else could be unhappy with his job performance (especially this week) and could have told him to hit the road.
Any info?
Any info?
Thursday, September 10, 2009
This is interesting
Has anyone ever seen Ordinance 32-20"P" happen during the day?
It says Chief "shall tour the City at least twice a week, during the day in uniform and in civilian dress at night" - shall is not optional.
Go to City link on right---->
Click "City Codes" near bottom of blue menu bar
Click view the City's Code
new window will open
Enter 32-20 under Section Number
Doesn't look good that from the top Ordinances are not followed.
And how come it only goes to "Y"? There is no "Z" in Chief of Police duties?
It says Chief "shall tour the City at least twice a week, during the day in uniform and in civilian dress at night" - shall is not optional.
Go to City link on right---->
Click "City Codes" near bottom of blue menu bar
Click view the City's Code
new window will open
Enter 32-20 under Section Number
Doesn't look good that from the top Ordinances are not followed.
And how come it only goes to "Y"? There is no "Z" in Chief of Police duties?
Wednesday, September 9, 2009
Does this sound "fair" to you?
One party in a contested matter requests a court reporter - request denied. Later the other party (the one who brought the charges) requests a court reporter and the proceedings are stopped because of this request. They will be rescheduled, with a court reporter I'm sure. But it seems that the first request for a court reporter should have been granted. Saying no to one and then yes to the other seems like favoritism - not an impartial hearing.
What do you think?
What do you think?
Tuesday, September 8, 2009
city attorney
seems to have a little "insurance" to pad his paycheck. What the heck is this about?
Anyone know why he is getting paid by Bergen Risk?
http://php.app.com/elec_contractors/results2.php?Business_Name=Zisa+%26+Hitscherich&Contracting_Entity=%25&Submit3=Search+Contracts
NJ Pay-to-Play Information Total $365,308
Borough of Paramus 12/31/2008 $3,025 Legal services
Borough of Paramus c/o Bergen Risk 12/31/2008 $39,360 Legal services
City of Hackensack c/o Bergen Risk 12/31/2008 $1,900 Legal services
City Clerk, City of Hackensack 12/31/2008 $266,643 Legal services
City of Hackensack c/o Bergen Risk 12/31/2008 $51,668 Legal services
South Bergen JIF Bergen Risk Managers 12/31/2008 $2,711 Legal services
Anyone know why he is getting paid by Bergen Risk?
http://php.app.com/elec_contractors/results2.php?Business_Name=Zisa+%26+Hitscherich&Contracting_Entity=%25&Submit3=Search+Contracts
NJ Pay-to-Play Information Total $365,308
Borough of Paramus 12/31/2008 $3,025 Legal services
Borough of Paramus c/o Bergen Risk 12/31/2008 $39,360 Legal services
City of Hackensack c/o Bergen Risk 12/31/2008 $1,900 Legal services
City Clerk, City of Hackensack 12/31/2008 $266,643 Legal services
City of Hackensack c/o Bergen Risk 12/31/2008 $51,668 Legal services
South Bergen JIF Bergen Risk Managers 12/31/2008 $2,711 Legal services
Tax Abatements
Friends and contributors are not getting favorable tax adjustments in Hackensack, are they?
http://mycentraljersey.com/article/20090908/STATE/90908001/Jersey+CIty+mayor+denies+contributions+influenced+tax+deal
http://mycentraljersey.com/article/20090908/STATE/90908001/Jersey+CIty+mayor+denies+contributions+influenced+tax+deal
Monday, September 7, 2009
Taping Council Meetings
http://www.northjersey.com/news/Keeping_watch_on_local__officials.html
If anyone tapes the Hackensack meetings, post them as a comment here.
If anyone tapes the Hackensack meetings, post them as a comment here.
Sunday, September 6, 2009
bergennow.com
You can rate your public officials
http://bergennow.com/
but you do have to give email address and register
http://bergennow.com/
but you do have to give email address and register
Coniglio's only one who was wrong?
http://www.northjersey.com/news/opinions/57580247.html#comments
It makes no sense. Only one hospital employee got immunity. Was he the only other person besides Coniglio who was involved in this? To reward Schrieks, the person who did most of the work setting things up, with another public job is just wrong. He obviously knew what was going on too. He didn't get immunity - but he seems to have some kind of "protection".
It makes no sense. Only one hospital employee got immunity. Was he the only other person besides Coniglio who was involved in this? To reward Schrieks, the person who did most of the work setting things up, with another public job is just wrong. He obviously knew what was going on too. He didn't get immunity - but he seems to have some kind of "protection".
Thursday, September 3, 2009
1st Ward Block Watch
Anybody know how the meeting went tonight? I understand HPD biggie was going to show. Also heard that the "smart" car was going to be used there. Like they won't see that coming and be able to outrun it.
ACLU joins lawsuit over city EMS records
http://www.northjersey.com/news/56824997.html
"He said that, as part of the negotiations, the hospital has agreed not to bill the city for any costs that exceed the cap this year."
Negotiations are give and take. Hospital gave this, what did they take?
More BS from City Manager. The number was not a good one. He did not want anyone to know that. Now he wants to look like a "hero" because he "renegotiated" - would really like to know what that cost us this time. If he had done it right the first time, this would not have been necessary. What a waste! Don't they realize that if they hadn't whored themselves out to HUMC at the cost of EMT jobs they would not be under such scrutiny now?
Thanks for stepping up Patrick Finely.
"He said that, as part of the negotiations, the hospital has agreed not to bill the city for any costs that exceed the cap this year."
Negotiations are give and take. Hospital gave this, what did they take?
More BS from City Manager. The number was not a good one. He did not want anyone to know that. Now he wants to look like a "hero" because he "renegotiated" - would really like to know what that cost us this time. If he had done it right the first time, this would not have been necessary. What a waste! Don't they realize that if they hadn't whored themselves out to HUMC at the cost of EMT jobs they would not be under such scrutiny now?
Thanks for stepping up Patrick Finely.
Wednesday, September 2, 2009
9/1 council meeting
Last night's meeting was a farce - more so than usual.
First issue - City Manager's report on EMS cap with HUMC. The number he got in July was not favorable (I know, we are all shocked). The projected amount for the year would be $30k+ over the $140k cap. Seems that when they came up with the magic number of $140k, they forgot to include mutual aid calls. So, HUMC went on more calls than EMTs had. He somehow managed to "renegotiate" the cap figure. He says, and we shall see, that whatever the actual amount is (possibly $175k) for this year, will be the "new cap" for next year. We will pay nothing for this service for this year. What has yet to be disclosed is what the City had to give up to get that. Was is the "air rights" lease for the walkways? That is supposed to be $250k per year. When this new contract is finalized we have to get a copy of it.
Second issue - Mayor Townes "new rules"
1. No comments from the audience - if you are not at the podium you are to act as if you are in church. If you utter a sound more than once, you will be escorted out of the room by the police.
2. During your 5 minutes of public comment the City Manager and Council are not going to answer any questions. If you are lucky, they will answer them after your 5 minutes alloted time.
3. After the meeting the Mayor told a group of citizens that they should submit their questions a week in advance if they wanted to get an answer at the council meeting.
Next council meeting is 9/15 - more people have to come out and speak up.
First issue - City Manager's report on EMS cap with HUMC. The number he got in July was not favorable (I know, we are all shocked). The projected amount for the year would be $30k+ over the $140k cap. Seems that when they came up with the magic number of $140k, they forgot to include mutual aid calls. So, HUMC went on more calls than EMTs had. He somehow managed to "renegotiate" the cap figure. He says, and we shall see, that whatever the actual amount is (possibly $175k) for this year, will be the "new cap" for next year. We will pay nothing for this service for this year. What has yet to be disclosed is what the City had to give up to get that. Was is the "air rights" lease for the walkways? That is supposed to be $250k per year. When this new contract is finalized we have to get a copy of it.
Second issue - Mayor Townes "new rules"
1. No comments from the audience - if you are not at the podium you are to act as if you are in church. If you utter a sound more than once, you will be escorted out of the room by the police.
2. During your 5 minutes of public comment the City Manager and Council are not going to answer any questions. If you are lucky, they will answer them after your 5 minutes alloted time.
3. After the meeting the Mayor told a group of citizens that they should submit their questions a week in advance if they wanted to get an answer at the council meeting.
Next council meeting is 9/15 - more people have to come out and speak up.
Monday, June 29, 2009
First Ward and Gangs
Does anyone have information about gang activity in Hackensack? From recent events it seems that DDP is in the First Ward How about any other gangs in any other areas? I've heard of some Trinitarios in the First Ward also. The more info we share on this, the safer we will all be.
Thursday, June 25, 2009
Here's a Good First Topic
http://www.northjersey.com/news/crimeandcourts/Chief_used_office_for_political_gain_suit_says.html
In my opinion, to blame this suit on the recent council election (as I heard the primary defendant say on 1010WINS) is irresponsible and divisive. I don't recall most of these plaintiffs being actively involved in the election (they certainly weren't candidates). How about "moving forward" and putting the election behind us?
What do you think?
In my opinion, to blame this suit on the recent council election (as I heard the primary defendant say on 1010WINS) is irresponsible and divisive. I don't recall most of these plaintiffs being actively involved in the election (they certainly weren't candidates). How about "moving forward" and putting the election behind us?
What do you think?
Monday, June 22, 2009
Let's See How This Works Out
I'm taking this for a test drive. Feel free to post your comments. They will not appear immediately, as we have to review them before allowing them to be viewed. We will try to monitor them on a regular basis. We'll see how this works out ...
If the comments are responsible, we may change the format to allow them without moderation. We'll have to see how it works out.
Basically, it is our intention to give the public a place to discuss issues without being subjected to the name calling and rude behavior on another forum.
Suggestions are welcome!
If the comments are responsible, we may change the format to allow them without moderation. We'll have to see how it works out.
Basically, it is our intention to give the public a place to discuss issues without being subjected to the name calling and rude behavior on another forum.
Suggestions are welcome!